State Owned Banks

The question everyone is asking is, who is going to be left holding the worthless tranches of those sub-prime American mortgages? We’re beginning to see some answers:

In Germany, it emerged that the state-bank SachsenLB may have
accumulated $80bn of exposure to risky assets through a set of Irish
funds kept off balance sheet.

The regional government of Saxony agreed yesterday to
sell the East German bank – the biggest victim so far of the worldwide
credit rout – for a token €300m (£204m) to the Landesbank
Baden-Württemberg in Stuttgart (LBBW), ending a three-week saga that
has revealed the extent of German involvement in the some of the most
treacherous areas of US sub-prime debt.

Georg Milbrandt, prime minister of Saxony, said the sale of state-owned lender was the only viable option.

"Given
the market turbulence and the pressures on the bank, it could not have
gone on without a partner. We want to get our ship off the high waves
and into a safe port," he said.

Sachsen LB, founded
in 1992 after the fall of the Berlin Wall, was rescued two weeks ago in
a state orchestrated bail-out. A consortium of banks agreed to provide
a €17.3bn credit lifeline, but only on the understanding that it agreed
to be sold to a stronger player.

It allegedly used
no fewer than five Irish ‘conduits’ (off-balance sheet vehicles) to
invest in collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) and other high-risk
instruments, according to German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung.

The
biggest losses stemmed from structured investment vehicles (SIVs) which
involve using short-term credit to buy longer-term assets, creating a
mismatch in maturities.

It would appear that it’s the taxpayers of Saxony who have taken that haircut.

Aren’t we lucky that we don’t have State owned investment banks here?

2 responses

  1. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    To turn an honest pfennig, they borrowed short to lend long through the medium of Irish whatchamacalls invested in Yankee liars’ loans, the whole schemozzle to be magically “off balance sheet”. And they get paid for making decisions like that? Is this native stupidity or is there corruption involved?
    Tim adds: Native stupidity. You’ll note that the Wall Street banks “sold” these loans, not bought them.

  2. The “taxpayers of Saxony”? Both of them? This is East Germany – high unemployment, low wages, underinvestment, etc. Will it really be they who pick up the bill? OK, so it was value in “their” bank that has been written off, but when would the Saxons otherwise have realized “their” value in “their” bank? I have to admit, I find this whole concept rather confusing. But I guess, if profits from the Landesbank subsidized the cost of the state government, it is unlikely that the German government will be able to resist calls for additional support, given the economic impact of raising funds from other sources in Saxony. Will we see pressure to reverse the recent tax-cuts or additional borrowing or deficits? It’s presumably going to put a dent in their growth or in their monetary policy, one way or another.

Leave a Reply to brunoCancel reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading