Tell It Like It Is Ulrich

So, it’s true then. Climate change can only be beaten by a New World Order.

Like the Titanic, the climate catastrophe knows no democracy. The
majority of the victims are trapped in the cheap lower decks, from
which there is no escape. Those who are driving climate change are
simultaneously attacking the poorest of the poor and threatening their
own means of survival. Those who seek to protect their citizens and
properties in Britain, the US and Japan from the flooding that will
occur when rivers burst their banks and sea levels rise are falling
prey to the illusion that the social and political consequences of
climate change can be addressed by a solo effort. This is merely
another way of dodging the key issue of global justice.

And those
who argue that "climate protection doesn’t hurt" (to use the words of
the German environment minister Sigmar Gabriel), that we can get
climate change under control by using fuel-efficient engines and
building clean power stations, are kidding themselves. Climate change
is not solely a matter of hurricanes, droughts, floods, refugee
movements, impending wars or unprecedented market failure. Suddenly,
and for the first time in history, every population, culture, ethnic
group, religion and region in the world faces a future that threatens
one and all. In other words, if we want to survive, we have to include
those who have been excluded. The politics of climate change is
necessarily inclusive and global – it is cosmopolitics.

Slightly worrying for all those who simply think that reducing emissions would be enough. Or, possibly, could it be, is it even vaguely possible, that our Professor of Sociology is simply grasping at whatever he can to bolster his desire for such a New World Order?

3 responses

  1. JuliaM Avatar
    JuliaM

    “..the climate catastrophe..”
    Oh noes! Weather! Run for the hills!!
    About time these Chicken Littles got a grip on themselves..

  2. In the new, anxious world, leaders must learn to think beyond borders.
    What is a border? A border is a line beyond which a “leader” does not have authority. Politicians make rules that go up to the border and not beyond; they send police as far as the border and not beyond.
    If leaders think beyond borders, then there are no borders. The “leader” can enforce his rules as far as his armies can win.
    If Gaia were, in Boris Johnson’s immortal words, to get Carboniferous on our ass, the results could not be as bad as if leaders were to think beyond borders.
    Presumably Beck’s hero is George W Bush, who has thought beyond borders more than most leaders have.

  3. Or, of course, Bush’s mentor on such things, speaking in 1999:
    Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community. By this I mean the explicit recognition that today more than ever before we are mutually dependent, that national interest is to a significant extent governed by international collaboration and that we need a clear and coherent debate as to the direction this doctrine takes us in each field of international endeavour. Just as within domestic politics, the notion of community – the belief that partnership and co-operation are essential to advance self-interest – is coming into its own; so it needs to find its own international echo. Global financial markets, the global environment, global security and disarmament issues: none of these can he solved without intense international co-operation.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading