Oh Dear, Sir Simon

It being a long time since I was fed Catholic dogma I’ll probably get some of this wrong myself but Simon Jenkins does seem to have grasped the wrong end of a number of sticks:

Who is this joker in Rome claiming supremacy via the greatest con in
Europe’s intellectual history, the 1870 Vatican council’s invention of
papal infallibility. Listen, Pope, I am inclined to say, two can play
at infallibility.

Well, if our Benedict were indeed claiming Papal Infallibility on this matter that might be a fair comment but I’m pretty sure he’s not. Do correct me if I’m wrong here but I think that the only time Papal Infallibility has indeed been claimed was back then in 1870, when Papal Infallibility was used to insist that the Pope could indeed speak Infallibly on various subjects. I’m really not certain that since then any Pope has stated that he’s speaking Infallibly on any other subject than that Papal Infallibility is possible.

The Pope drew a distinction between the Orthodox churches, which he calls sisters (surely brothers?),

No, obviously not: Mother Church, remember?

While Roman Catholics scurry off to their modern sheds, it is the
Anglican vicar who might reasonably imitate Benedict, sit atop his
gothic steeple and proclaim his to be "the one true church".

Something of a touchy subject there: the jexting arm of lapsed Catholics (of which I am one) has been known to argue that the architecture of Roman Catholic churches would be vastly improved by hte Church of England handing back those ones built by Catholics: you get to keep St. Paul’s for example, but we get Westminster Abbey back, along with all those built before about 1550 or so.

And as a special bonus:

I would not disestablish parish churches, rather the reverse. I would
"establish" them, as in Germany and other continental countries, as the
formal responsibility of parishes and municipalities, a charge on local
rates and a religious and secular amenity for all local people, as in
the middle ages. Everyone paid to build them. They belong to everyone
and should be open to everyone. They just need the product of a penny
rate to prop them up – and need it ever more desperately.

We get the return of the Church Tithe! Well, I suppose that when you give someone a knighthood there is always the possibility that he’ll get all feudal on you.

12 responses

  1. The Laughing Cavalier Avatar
    The Laughing Cavalier

    jexting?

  2. In 1992 the Catholic Church finally exonerated Galileo for the grave heresy of publicising his theory that the earth moved round the sun – which left us a bit uncertain about what the sun was supposed to be doing prior to 1992:
    http://cerebro.xu.edu/math/math147/02f/galileo/galileointro.html

  3. *tsk* The immaculate conception and assumption were both proclaimed ex cathedra.
    You obviously weren’t beaten enough at prep school.

  4. fjfjfj Avatar
    fjfjfj

    But we do pay for the upkeep of churches. Think of all those grants.

  5. With all the politicking going on at present, with Gordon Brown clearly distancing government from both Church and Crown, giving Royal Prerogatives to parliament and abdicating his responsibilities to appoint Church leaders being but two, I think that the Catholic leadership is sensing the possible end to the CofE in its present form and is therefore making moves to retake the UK aka pre Henry VIII.

  6. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    I don’t see why transferring the control of Churches from the descendants of the people who built them to the descendants of a bunch of Wild Irishmen constitutes handing them “back”.

  7. Charles Orton-Jones Avatar
    Charles Orton-Jones

    The papacy first claimed infallibility in 1075, with the publication of the Dictatus Papae. Pope Gregory VII was struggling for secular supremacy with Emperor Henry IV and this document was the papacy’s trump card.
    Clause 22: the Roman church has never erred; nor will it ever.
    See: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/g7-dictpap.html

  8. Recusant Avatar
    Recusant

    Dearieme
    Who are you calling Irish? Not a drop, I’ll have you know.
    This article aside, Simon Jenkins does seem to be getting angrier and angrier. His role now seems to be that of professional miserabalist.As politics slips back into the form we have been used to on this isle for the last 400 years – Cavalier.v.Roundhead – he has clearly nailed his puritan banner to the church door: barrel of laughs he ain’t.

  9. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    Recusant: me, actually. In part.

  10. “I don’t see why transferring the control of Churches from the descendants of the people who built them to the descendants of a bunch of Wild Irishmen constitutes handing them “back”.”
    Better wild Irishmen than Scotch heretics.

  11. Didn’t know you were a lapsed Catholic. Visiting the most conservative of Catholic websites, catholicfundamentalism.com may either confirm you in your belief, or open a new door. Very briefly, it puts forth the idea of God as Programmer. He can program particles, complile them into structures and beings, and have them move through time.
    With that premise, the 10,000 year age of the universe, and all the miracles, and all the Bible, and The Church, make perfect sense.
    If you aren’t absolutely sure you’re right about The Church not being for you, it may be better to check out the site than check off your soul.

  12. michael Avatar
    michael

    The Pope is only infallible in matters of faith and morals. This does not mean he can accurately predict the winner of the Grand National. Jenkins talk of modern sheds is a bit harsh given the CofE disolved the monasteries and nicked ancient Catholic art and treasure.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading