Domains and Addresses.

I don’t know enough about the internet naming conventions to know whether this is actually true:

In the internet world, country codes such as.uk, and
generic suffixes such as.com and.net, are known as top-level domains.
The second-level domain is whatever precedes this suffix: for
example.co,.ac or.gov. But some of our most important national
institutions – Parliament, the police, the British Library and, rather
curiously, the Ministry of Defence – have been allowed to dispense with
a shared second-level domain. Instead, they use their own name or
initials – for example, http://www.police.uk – enhancing their status while
stressing their independence.

The obvious address
for Britain’s supreme court should therefore be http://www.supremecourt.uk – a
vacant site, but one that Lord Hope has been refused.

Officials
told him it would be "too expensive" to buy – a minimum of £125,000.
And they say there is no guarantee that the naming committees would
allow "supremecourt" to be a second-level domain, given that it will be
a small institution and very few email addresses would be derived from
it.

Any ideas? Why would a vacant name cost so much? Do all the root servers have to be reprogrammed or something?

6 responses

  1. Remittance Man Avatar
    Remittance Man

    Doesn’t the House of Lords already have a website. Unless the legislation has already passed this is still Britain’s hghest court of appeal.
    RM

  2. The problem isn’t so much cost as responsibility. Nominet has managed the .uk domain space since 1996, and no new .uks have been issued since then. There are a few knocking around – parliament.uk, police.uk, and some of the sort of academic research centre types who started out on the Internet.
    The problem is, though, that Nominet was given control of all the .uk second level domains (co.uk, org.uk, ac.uk, gov.uk etc) it didn’t take over the root .uk…which was going out of use, supposedly.
    So, if not Nominet, then whose are the missing .uks? No-one else has taken responsibility. According to Nominet’s site,
    an ad-hoc group of geeks called the Naming Committee was responsible for domain names under .uk before then. So who is the heir to the Committee? JANET perhaps?

  3. Whoops. ac.uk and gov.uk belong to UKERNA, which is…part of JANET, so I recommend the noble lord gets his arse down to the Rutherford Appleton Lab.

  4. Chris harper Avatar
    Chris harper

    Nominet is the successor body to the Naming Committee.
    If it wants to set up further second level domains then it can, ten minutes work on its master Domain Name Server. If it is more than ten minutes work then someone has screwed up somewhere. If they want to charge $125,000 for this, then what the hell. Their choice. Price gougers. Besides, the Supreme Court properly should be supremecourt.gov.uk.
    The .uk domain was never going to be phased out. The top level domain of every other country, bar the UK, is designated by their two digit ISO country code. Even the US has the code .us, although up ’till recently, it was seldom used. The UK ISO code is ‘gb’ (for Great Britain), which was used a bit initially along with uk, and it is that, .gb, which was being phased out.

  5. Surely, by analogy with parliament, it should NOT be .gov.uk – the courts are still independent of government, just…

  6. Muhammad Riaz khan Avatar
    Muhammad Riaz khan

    I want to come uk by leagal way so please helpe me.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading