Sex Trafficking.

Forgive me if I get a little confused here. There’s a report on a raid on a brothel where some 19 women were being held as sex slaves. Good, excellent. Here’s the bit I don’t understand:

Kate Allen, the director of Amnesty International UK,
urged the Government to sign up to the new European Convention Against
Trafficking.

She said: "Amnesty welcomes the West
Midlands police crackdown on traffickers and their vicious trade in
women who are held prisoner and forced to work as prostitutes.

"But the UK needs to protect the victims of this brutal industry as well as catching the traffickers.

"We
must turn the system around so that they are recognised as the victims
and not the perpetrators of crime. The UK Government must sign up to
the new European Convention."

Details of such
activities in Birmingham came to light in February when a gangster was
jailed for 11 years at Southwark Crown Court.

Vullnet Ismailaj, 27, led a prostitution empire that trafficked eastern European women into Britain, netting him £300,000.

The
following month, an Albanian immigrant, Xhevahir Pisha, 21, was jailed
for seven years by Sheffield Crown Court along with two other men for
their part in forcing a teenage girl into prostitution.
The 15-year-old Lithuanian girl was forced to work in a brothel in
Birmingham two days after arriving in Britain when a man paid £4,000
for her. She was imprisoned in Pisha’s house in Coventry.

So we already have laws against what was happening. We’re already jailing those who do it. Why do we need to sign up to a European Declaration on anything? It’s already illegal!

I’d also point out that the way to uncover such operations is good old fashioned coppers on the beat. PC Jones, after a month in his area, would know  who the tarts are, know where the brothels were. That’s what beat bobbies are, in part, for, to know what is going on in their small area.

4 responses

  1. Sounds like the job for somebody who knows the industry and has a grasp of Slavic languages. I might consider it in my retirement plans. I’d be known as a trick-tsar.

  2. Though the convention confirms an obligation to prosecute and prevent traffickers, it’s largely interested in protecting the human rights of victims.
    Amnesty International argue that it will fill the gaps between existing states obligations to victims in trafficking. As I understand it, the convention is about attempting to ensure that the level of protection due to victims of trafficking isn’t horribly dependent on where in Europe those victims are found.

  3. the european convention on trafficking

    Tim Worstall asks why we need to sign up to a European Convention on Trafficking if it’s already illegal in this country. Well, the convention isn’t so much about criminalising the traffickers as improving the plight of victims.

  4. It’s been said before in these comments, but it’s important.
    The convention is about securing the rights of those who have been ‘trafficked’ and forced into the sex industry. It concerns what happens to them after they are ‘rescued’, and recognises that they might need specific support and help, rather than being simply treated as illegal immigrants, and immediately deported. It is not about prosecuting the ‘traffickers’.
    New Labour refused to sign up, because, according to the Home office:
    Women might make false claims of abuse to try and stay in the country…
    or
    Women might use the sex trade as a preferred route of entry to the country…

    Pandering to the Daily Mail, as ever…

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading