Land Development Tax.

Prescott is looking at imposing a land development tax. No, this isn’t unfortunately, the single land tax of Henry George, more’s the pity.

On the face of it I don’t see why it shouldn’t be a good idea. There is a huge difference in the value of agricultural land (4k and acre?) and land with planning permission (500k an acre?). The only thing that gives that difference is the action of the local council in granting the planning permission. As it is, solely, a gain given by the allocation of a government licence I don’t see why it shouldn’t be taxed.

On the larger picture that very price difference shows that there is something grievously wrong with our planning system but that’s another matter.

As the Telegraph notes it may not be all this simple.

There have been four attempts since the war to introduce such a tax,
three by Labour governments, and all failed or were not given time to
work.

Even if it is a good idea in theory don’t doubt the ability of Government to cock it up.

In

2 responses

  1. Tom Kratman Avatar
    Tom Kratman

    Tim,
    The problem is that this could very easily become a “taking” by way of taxation.
    Tom

  2. brian organ Avatar
    brian organ

    if the hassle of getting planning permission makes it not worth while developing my land because it will be taxed unfairly i will grow cherry trees on it and enjoy the perfume
    brian

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading