One of the things that Racel Uchitel said, about having "crazy Ambien sex" with Tiger Woods seems to have got a few people puzzled.

How can something that puts you to sleep make for good sex? Surely it will just lead to good snoring?

Well, yes and no, for people are forgetting what is the limiting factor to good sex:

So, given all of this, what is going to be the limiting factor
(assuming everything else is constant, like the two people actually
desire to have sex with each other and so on) as to how much fun
there's going to be in one incidence of sex? Correct, it's going to be
how long the man can keep going before he orgasms and needs that
recuperation break.

At which point we can see that a drug which
reduces arousal in a male can indeed lead to much better sex. As long
as basic arousal (ie, an erection) is achieved, for maximum fun and
pleasure we want less, not more sensitivity, less not more arousal.

Of course, it was an economist who came up with this answer, not a sex expert and most certainly not a drug expert.

For of course, economists know all!