Tim Worstall

That Old Roman Law Thing

Just a gentle reminder:

"The Maestro’s wishes in the first will have been respected and we have
no problem with how that has been attributed. However this did not
cover the American estate and the three daughters from his first
marriage are entitled to a share of this."

There’s a huge difference between Continental (ie Roman) law and Anglo-Saxon. In the latter system, those assets that you’ve built up in your life are yours, to be disposed of upon your death as you see fit. Sure, the taxman will get a cut, but you can leave it to the dogs home, your mistress or your children, your choice.  The Continental system states that a certain portion must be given to your children. In short, that what is yours is not, in fact, yours, and must be disposed of as the State insists.

Gonna be interesting when the EU tries to harmonize that, isn’t it? (A rumour I’ve heard says that they’re going to try, too.)

In

5 responses

  1. james C Avatar
    james C

    ‘There’s a huge difference between Continental (ie Roman) law and Anglo-Saxon. In the latter system, those assets that you’ve built up in your life are yours, to be disposed of upon your death as you see fit. Sure, the taxman will get a cut, but you can leave it to the dogs home, your mistress or your children, your choice.’
    Wrong-several Anglo-Saxon countries have Inheritance Acts which give dependents the right to challenge wills.

    Reply
  2. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    We’ve had no prob in 300 years of the Union. Scotland runs on Roman Law and restricts how you may leave your assets, presumably on the reasoning that you aren’t going to get off with leaving your widow and gets as a potential charge on everyone else.

    Reply
  3. Sam Avatar
    Sam

    And in England and Wales it is possible for a dependant to challenge a will on the grounds that he should have been left reasonable provision, but wasn’t.
    The bar is fairly high, though.

    Reply
  4. Geoff Avatar
    Geoff

    Tim
    It’s nearly 40 years since I studied succession law, but I think Australian (and English) law has sometbing called testator’s family maintenance, which might be what dearieme refers to.

    Reply
  5. Geoff Avatar
    Geoff

    … actually, it was Sam, not dearieme

    Reply

Leave a Reply to GeoffCancel reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading