Oh no, none at all. It simply isn’t possible to cut taxation without reducing services:
Almost £500 million of taxpayers’ money will be spent on covering the costs of
the bungled implementation of a new payment system to English farmers, a
parliamentary inquiry reports today.
Half a large one, eh? That we shouldn’t even be subsidizing farming is one thing, but to waste so much while doing so….
A modest proposal – instead of calling it ‘a large one’ perhaps the unit of wasting a billion could be called a band?
Then a thousandth of that would be a ..?
On second thought, I think it’s already been claimed by ‘a total waste’.
That £500m is only a minute part of the wasteful and fruitless spending programmes – the full extent of waste and mismanagement is monumental:
“The big increases in education funding since 1999 have not been put to good use, the government’s statisticians said on Tuesday.”
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4b0f62c4-5b4a-11dc-8c32-0000779fd2ac.html
“A string of government policies aimed at boosting pre-school children’s educational achievement in England has had no impact, research suggests.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6966112.stm
“The proportion of young people in England who are not in education, training or work appears to have gone up, despite government efforts.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/5059650.stm
“Cancer survival rates in Britain are among the lowest in Europe, according to the most comprehensive analysis of the issue yet produced.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/21/ncancer121.xml
“The UK has the worst standard of care for stroke victims in western Europe, with thousands of patients dying unnecessarily every year, a senior doctor said today.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,2155567,00.html
Blair’s legacy? What has the government being doing for the last 10 years?
Leave a Reply to Bob BCancel reply