For all its faults, rugby and the people who watch it
can teach football so many important lessons. In the next month, no
matter how demanding the contest, no player will challenge the
authority of the referee. If he does, he will be punished, not only
with dismissal but also with shame, and nobody will defend him. Compare
this sense of order with the lawlessness of football, where officials
are mocked as a matter of routine by players and managers.
Also,
no matter how heated things get on the pitch, no matter how much strong
drink is taken, there will be no need to segregate the crowds. There
will be no obscenities chanted, no public disorder, and not a single
arrest. Rugby is a self-policing game that encourages respect for
opponents (yes, even while they’re busy smacking one another) and, most
important, for the sport.
If you consider
qualities of loyalty and discipline essential ones to instil in our
untamed young people, then you might think we should be playing more
rugby in our schools, and less kick-ball. And if you think Rhys Jones
might be alive today if his murderer had ever played a sport that
valued comradeship and chivalry above rancid tribalism, you are not
necessarily wrong.
I’ll admit to preferring rugby myself, and yes, there is a very large difference in the way that the crowds behave. However, claiming that inner city drug crime would be solved by chavs playing rugby rather than soccer really does strike me as being over the top.
Leave a Reply to NeilMCancel reply