Paul Krugman tries to use what he thinks is a killer argument here:
Suppose, for a
moment, that the Heritage Foundation were to put out a press release attacking
the liberal view that even children whose parents could afford to send them to
private school should be entitled to free government-run education.
They’d have a point: many American families with middle-class incomes do send
their kids to school at public expense, so taxpayers without school-age children
subsidize families that do. And the effect is to displace the private sector: if
public schools weren’t available, many families would pay for private schools
instead.
So let’s end this un-American system and make education what it should be — a
matter of individual responsibility and private enterprise. Oh, and we shouldn’t
have any government mandates that force children to get educated, either. As a
Republican presidential candidate might say, the future of America’s education
system lies in free-market solutions, not socialist models.
O.K., in case you’re wondering, I haven’t lost my mind, I’m drawing an
analogy. The real Heritage press release, titled “The Middle-Class Welfare Kid
Next Door,” is an attack on proposals to expand the State Children’s Health
Insurance Program. … And Rudy Giuliani’s call for “free-market solutions, not socialist models”
was about health care, not education…
The truth is that there’s no difference in principle between saying that
every American child is entitled to an education and saying that every American
child is entitled to adequate health care. It’s just a matter of historical
accident that we think of access to free K-12 education as a basic right, but
consider having the government pay children’s medical bills “welfare,“ with all
the negative connotations that go with that term.
And then, over here, we get this little factoid:
DCPS superintendent Michelle Rhee is doing a heroic job trying to
get textbooks into classrooms by the start of school. One problem is
that school officials still can’t tell her how many books they actually
need. Classes start on Monday.
Is the problem insufficient funding? As it happens, DCPS’s total gross budget for the last school year was upwards of one billion dollars according to its own website, and its enrollment was about 52,000 students.
That means DCPS had total per pupil spending of nearly $20,000 last
year, or half a million dollars per class of 25 students. You’d think
that would cover books.
The District’s perennial problem with getting books into students’
hands is a great illustration of what’s wrong with the status quo. When
was the last time you walked into a Barnes and Noble or a Borders
bookstore in mid August and didn’t see a well-stocked “back to school”
display? Why is it so easy for them to handle inventory
issues when they don’t even know how many customers they are going to
have, while DCPS is flummoxed, year after year, despite having a fairly
accurate enrollment number up front?
That’s just what everyone is worried about, that a State run health care system will be exactly and precisely as efficient and effective as the State run education system.
Leave a Reply to deariemeCancel reply