You really will want to read this.
The man who made the tape of Boris Johnson talking to Darius Guppy explains what actually happened.
Here’s the full story and here’s today’s update.
Boris actually comes out of it rather well.
Boris Johnson and Darius Guppy
In
62 responses
-
here is a heavy that guppy has not contacted to “do you in”! yes thats me Risdon. i have a problem with you, infact its not just you, i have a problem with all grasses. im picking on you because you think you are a big,bright man, when infact your just a little slug, hiding behind the old bill. i couldnt give 2 fucks about the old bill, ive done more years in the can then youve made comments on this dismal blog. jst beacuse i aint contacted you in a while doesnt mean ive let the beef go, no it just frustrates me more. reply back kidda or thats it
-
looks like the supergrass has vanished. wishful thinking id say! probably making up some bullshit about guppy or his life as a low life informer! i smell a rat!
-
Risdon, we have herd a whisper from a very good source that you are not only a low life police informer but you are also a informer for the security services. Scrapping the barrel aint we?? I smell a rat! could you confirm this??
-
No surprises that Peter Risdon has failed to meet our latest challenges, Tim.
As even you will have worked out by now the champion of free speech and transparency is a huge fan of censorship when it comes to concealing his own grubby little past.
Anyway, we have the report into the circumstances surrounding Risdon’s disqualification as a company director. In particular we have a copy of an affidavit signed by Risdon himself, (which we will post in due course along with the other material), entitled: ‘Form of disqualification undertaking.’ Without boring you with the details this form constitutes a sort of ‘guilty plea’ in proceedings brought by the authorities against Risdon.
Appended to that form is a ‘schedule of unfit conduct to the disqualification undertaking given by Peter William Risdon’ in respect of Glasir Ltd and The Circle Squared Limited.
It makes interesting reading.
Remember the story so far, Tim:
In his truly ridiculous website Risdon has set himself up as a defender of the truth and of the people’s freedoms. Rather snootily he has sniffed at the likes of ‘the now disgraced Clive Goodman.’
In his various ‘explanations’ given on a variety of blogs he has conveniently overlooked a past that, to put it at its politest, constitutes a catalogue of disgrace, incompetence and informing to various authorities. Above all cowardice and pettiness are the features of his ‘career.’
When confronted with the evidence of his disqualification as a company director on this blog, Risdon came up with two excuses:
It was all a mere peccadillo and
It was the fault of one of his colleagues, who was responsible for ‘admin.’
Sorry, but the evidence suggests otherwise.
In fact, the very first admissions Risdon makes in his affidavit are:
“I (not anyone else, but I, Peter Risdon) caused Circle to trade in breach of its statutory obligations to the Crown Departments etc” and
“From the date of my appointment as a director on 19 November 2000, I (not anyone else, but I, Peter Risdon) caused or allowed Glasir to trade in breach of its statutory obligations to the Crown Departments etc”
The details are too many to list here and you’ll be able to read them for yourself, Tim. However, as a taster, incredibly, not only did Glasir fail to register for PAYE, for example, but traded for a full 26 months without making a single payment or return to the Inland Revenue.
In other words, this was no ‘peccadillo’, a question of Risdon being a little late in filing a couple of returns, this was a question of someone, from the very outset and throughout the life of the company, deliberately siphoning off moneys due to the Revenue. Likewise, with the company’s VAT. Quoting Risdon’s own words: “No payments whatsoever were made against the quarters ending 02/02; 05/02; 08/02 and 11/02.” Again, moneys that he had received from his VAT supplies and which he was supposed to pass on to the Customs and Excise were simply siphoned off.
In a nutshell, there was a total deficiency in respect of The Circle Squared of £137,141 and of £138,414 in respect of Glasir.
All of which is entirely consistent with Risdon\\\’s former business partner\\\’s descriptions of his business practices, as you will see for yourself, Tim.
In fact, what is so amazing is not that Risdon was simply disqualified but that he didn’t go to jail as well. You may speculate as to why.
One can only marvel at Risdon’s hypocrisy. Anyone with a past like Risdon’s and even an ounce of self-awareness or, frankly, honesty, would have hesitated before setting themselves up as a moral arbiter or, at the very least, would have come entirely clean in their ‘explanations’ instead of compounding their dishonesty by concealing entire tracts of their history and coming up with such an array of ludicrous excuses.
But not our Norman.
We repeat our challenge to Risdon to post the legal correspondence in respect of the libel action against him. If he thought this one through he would realise that, if what he is saying about that libel action is true, then it is only a matter of time before that material will make its way into the public record in any case. He may as well disclose it now, therefore. As we’ve said before, what’s the betting that both sets of lawyers will have asked Risdon for evidence to back up his claims, and what’s the betting that Risdon, as usual, will have failed to provide anything.
A further challenge for Risdon as a result of further investigations:
Let him provide an ‘explanation’ in respect of an armed robbery for which he was tried in Scotland.
Interesting remark from the previous blogger about Risdon\\\’s grassing history. A line of enquiry worth pursuing. So let him also confirm or deny whether, as well as being a registered informer for the police, he is also an informer for any other agencies.
As before, let him post the answers before someone else does. -
I sell a rat!
-
I smell a rat!
-
Well, Tim, we have obtained the copies of the legal correspondence relating to DG’s legal action against Peter Risdon. (You can get a copy yourself by telephoning DG’s lawyers and they’ll have no objection because their letters were all open, unlike Risdon’s solicitors’, a number of which were ‘Without Prejudice’).
Remember the story so far:-
Risdon created a posting entitled “Darius Guppy.” In that posting he made a number of self-evidently ludicrous allegations including one that he had a photograph of DG emerging from his house on the morning of his arrest wearing sunglasses (despite the fact that the arrest had occurred in the early hours of the morning when it was dark and that there was no mention of the supposed sunglasses in the custody records). But the most serious allegation was that DG had trashed his car, arranging for it to be covered in paint stripper and then telephoning him afterwards to claim responsibility.
He felt like someone wielding a “blunderbuss” against a child armed only with a “pea-shooter” and, moreover, he had “mountains” of evidence against DG, including proof of his guilt in relation to the supposed paint stripper attack in the form of a police investigation that had occurred and also a BT complaints department investigation that had “successfully traced” the call to DG.
At this point DG, a man who, unlike Risdon, clearly prefers action to talk, launched libel proceedings against Risdon.
Risdon then created a second posting entitled “libel news” in which he repeated the original allegation and compounded matters by adding yet further palpably silly accusations. This time DG had even bugged the Prosecution’s rooms at his trial!
No! Libel proceedings or not, the accusations stand! he thundered.
Freeborn John had spoken.
And the world of men…Trembled.
Well, and you really didn’t need the gift of second sight to anticipate it, the legal correspondence centres on attempts to get Risdon to produce his “blunderbuss”- type evidence and, as always with Peter Risdon, no such evidence is forthcoming.
In short, he is caught lying, yet again.
To cut a long story short, Tim, Risdon has been very quickly obliged to withdraw his postings, to undertake not to repeat those allegations and to make a donation to a charity of DG’s choice.
Peter Risdon’s humiliation is complete.
(Although he can look forward to yet further embarrassment when our increasingly large dossier, which includes the legal correspondence, is finally posted).
To use one of his favourite expressions – he picked a fight and lost.
Admit it, Tim, the man is a walking, breathing, living DISASTER area. Everything he touches turns to dust.
But most damaging of all for him in all of this has been his evident, warped and self-destructive obsession with DG, an obsession that has blinded him and drained him of any sense of judgement.
Remember his IP address theories? Remember his Wikipedia conspiracies? Well, apart from his obviously poor knowledge of geography, confusing, as we have already pointed out, Pretoria with Cape Town and the Middle East, there is also the question of how IP addresses actually work, a fact that is known to our Norman but which, in his typically dishonest style, he chose to overlook when outlining his conspiracy theories.
Now we really don’t want to sound anything like Risdon, heaven forbid, but even the most superficial research indicates that there are things such as ‘dynamic’ and ‘static’ IP addresses and that the former, which apply in this case, can incorporate literally millions of users. Again, hardly “blunderbuss”- type evidence, is it Tim?
None of this matters remotely of course and we genuinely don’t “give a shit” about Risdon’s theories concerning a website that can hardly be considered a reliable source of information in any case, but the important point here is what all of this reveals about the workings of a genuinely obsessed and twisted mind. For, again, the most superficial glance at DG’s entry in the site in question shows in the ‘history’ section literally hundreds and hundreds of entries and edits going back many years. Just think what a perverse and utterly tortured personality is required to sift through all of these entries, checking their IP addresses, one by one, only to formulate a theory that at its most merely suggests that one of millions of possible individuals once wrote something positive about DG.
The man is, frankly, an embarrassment.
What has the dialogue on this blog shown, therefore, Tim?
– Just how blinded by his obsession Risdon has become, compelling him to fall into all manner of traps and to make a total fool of himself.
– That Peter Risdon is a man of hot air, rather than action. (Incidentally, a recent Google search on DG brought up the following link: http://www.biographyonline.net/politicians/boris-johnson.html, where the website in question has been forced to retract a false allegation against DG – yet further evidence, as if any were required, that DG, unlike Risdon, is ready to “put up”, as you put it so well, Tim).
– That Risdon is a pathological fantasist and liar.
– That anyone can write literally anything about anyone else on the net. We could have done exactly the same thing about Risdon, for example, inventing all manner of accusations. Now, one could just about understand such behaviour on the part of a teenage girl posting catty comments on Facebook, but from a man in his late forties who wishes so desperately to be taken seriously as a political and moral pundit?
– That one should never make a threat unless one means to see it through.
– That far from writing “well”, as you once put it rather generously, Risdon cannot construct even the most basic argument and underpin it with logic. Look at his utterly sad website again, Tim. His comments on Islam, to focus on only one example, are so obviously in bad faith and made on the basis of no research whatsoever that they are genuinely risible. The whole website is nothing short of juvenile.
– That Peter Risdon has only one available course by which to salvage any form of dignity: if he has a problem with someone then instead of waffling about it on the web in terms that make him look such a fool, let him knock on that person’s door and express his grievances face to face. To date he has consistently refused to meet this challenge. In short, to emerge with even an ayota of pride, for the first time in his life Peter Risdon will have to – be a man.
Finally, we end with Peter Risdon’s own words.
Remember his original ‘explanation’ posting and how he ended it so pompously, Tim?
Thinking he is addressing DG, he wrote:
“Instead, I prefer to let this (his ‘explanation’) stand, as a monument to your vanity, stupidity and arrogance.”
Well, in case the penny still hasn’t dropped for the slow learner, let us spell it out for him:
No, Risdon, you have failed yet again to realise the irony of your own words, for it is in fact WE who will be copying this exchange and posting it along with the other evidence against YOU, as a monument to YOUR vanity, YOUR stupidity and YOUR arrogance.
Good luck, Tim. -
Where has the rat gone?? Lets all hope he’s went the way of old Yellow!
-
Have a look at the following, Tim:
http://WWW.NOBODYLIKESAGRASS.COM
Peter Risdon is calamity.
A total embarrassment.
What a deeply unpleasant coward, liar and grass.
Rumour has it that DG’s lawyers are looking into further law suits against Risdon.
And rumour also has it that this is just the beginning for Peter Risdon.
There is a wealth more material to publish. Some of it will be known to Risdon –further examples of his lying in print such as a letter to the Evening Standard and one to Private Eye. Further Police Statements. Further statements from former colleagues. Further evidence of his role as police informer and informer for other agencies. Further evidence regarding his criminality. Transcripts and lawyers notes of the DG/BM trial and Committal Proceedings and so on and so forth. Literally thousands of pages, some being fetched from archives as we speak, some which we’ll get round to posting in due course. And none of this includes details regarding his less than savoury personal life as well as one or two other unpleasant surprises that he can look forward to.
Didn’t he realise that this stuff wouldn’t just disappear? What possessed him to lie in such an obvious and incompetent manner? Didn’t he realise that now, with the internet, more than ever before, those lies would bite him in the backside one day? Was he mad? Or perhaps a little masochistic? Maybe just desperate for attention? Or perhaps he just thought that the people investigating him were bluffers and fantasists like him? Or was he simply stupid?
Who knows?
What is certain is that to have grassed in the way he did is bad enough. To then lie so many times by attempting to foist the blame onto others for his own cowardice and treachery is actually plain evil. But to construct those lies in such an unintelligent and asinine manner is vintage Peter Risdon.
Anyway, for every lie that Risdon utters we will increase the heat several fold – to a degree that will shock him.
Isn’t it time he acted like a man and faced those he considers responsible for exposing him? -
Thought you might find the following amusing, Tim.
A couple of comments were just posted on Risdon’s Free Bjorn Borg website leading to http://www.nobodylikesagrass as an experiment in Risdon’s intellectual honesty more than any thing else.
Guess what?
Within 3 minutes (no exaggeration) they had been deleted by the prophet of free speech and the following message has been put on all his comments pages:
“Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.”
!!!
1. What a dweeb to be sitting all day on his computer writing comments to himself and checking whether anyone has posted anything
2. What a total hypocrite (as if we needed to remind you). Remember, this is the Prophet of Free Speech!
We’ve noticed too how his website has quite a few links to your own blog. Which explains why you’ve been a little ‘biased’ in your comments, though, to be fair, more subtle than the slow learner.
But what, oh what, Tim, are you doing in bed with such a deeply unpleasant, creepy loser?
Does he have secret tapes on you by any chance? -
SEE http://WWW.NOBODYLIKESAGRASS.COM
Well, well Tim.
How is it that the blog ends at this point? For some reason a huge section amounting to thousands of words and proving Risdon as a pathological liar and fantasist has been removed.
This section can be seen on the website above (See EXHIBIT 52).
It is of course possible that this is simply the result of some technical glitch and we are not prone to Risdon-like conspiracy theories so let’s give you the benefit of the doubt.
You should therefore re-instate the original post which exposes your buddy as the liar and hypocrite he is, or else we will.
Alternatively, of course, there is another explanation – which is that you share your pal’s fondness for censorship as well as his dishonesty.
We really hope this isn’t the case, Tim. Because, believe us, the last thing you want is for the people who have exposed Risdon to start taking an interest in You.
If we’re wrong on this, Tim, then apologies.
But whatever the case, don’t make the same mistake your friend Risdon made. -
SEE
http://WWW.NOBODYLIKESAGRASS.COM
Well, well, Tim. For some strange reason a massive section of dialogue with the supergrass Peter Risdon appears to have been deleted at this point.
Still, interested readers can see for themselves the extract in question at the website mentioned above.
It is of course entirely possible that there is some innocent, technical explanation for this deletion in which case, our apologies.
However, there is another possibility – which is that you share your pal Risdon’s predilection for censorship as well as his dishonesty.
If this interpretation is wrong then you can always re-instate the missing passage.
But if it is correct then let us hope that the people behind exposing the revolting Peter Risdon do not decide to turn their attention to you, because that – you can take it from us – is the last thing on earth you want to happen.
You challenged us to “put up or shut up.” Unlike Risdon, we took up that challenge and “put up.”
Risdon was proven a liar, a fantasist, a hypocrite, a filthy grass and an incompetent, petty criminal.
And you know it.
You must now have the good grace and honesty to admit when you have been proven wrong.
If you do not instinctively possess these qualities then one day people are going to have to teach them to you.
Leave a Reply