You can just hear it, can’t you? The lip smacking, the relish with which this figures are trotted out:
The gradual introduction of luxury taxes and schemes to promote war
savings was a huge struggle, constantly agonised over. The government
employed the best creative artists of the day to persuade people. It
worked. Together with rationing, that six-year period saw a 95% drop in
use of motor vehicles; use of household electrical appliances fell by
82%; and consumption of all goods and services fell by 16% (much higher
at household level).
That’s Andrew Simms from the new economics foundation (who suffer dreadfully from the Great Capitals Shortage). It is indeed "new economics" for he’s praising the drop in consumption of all goods and services.
That is, when translated into everyday speak, a supposed economist praising the fact that everyone has just got poorer. By 16% no less.
But then, for Simms and his buddies, that’s actually the point. Climate change is only the cover, the excuse. They do actually believe that making people poorer is the right thing to do.
They are, remember, the people who said that Vanuatu is the best place on the planet to live. This is many things but it isn’t economics: maybe they are in fact simply the High Priests of the Prince Phillip Movement?
Leave a Reply