So they’ve unveiled a (near) zero carbon house. Hooray!
No, that’s not sarcasm either. Pre-fab housing which uses less energy, all for it. The builders claim it will be cheaper than traditionally built housing too, which is even better. At 110 sq m (roughly 1,000 sq ft) it’s pretty small but then I’m sure larger versions can also be built.
Two questions that occur. Given the large windows (and thus I assume the passive solar heating through them) can they be built to the required density required by current planning regulations? Or, like the Passivehaus ideas, do they fall foul of those restrictions?
Secondly, timber framed housing. Is there a reason (other than we’ve not done it very much in the UK) why we don’t use this technique all that often? I can imagine (and have no knowledge here, I’m hoping for a comment or two to inform me) that the US experience, where most housing is timber framed, means that it will work….or is there something about our damp and rainy climate that means we’ve avoided it in the past?
Another way of asking the same question. Why haven’t we been using timber frames, as many others do? Not invented here syndrome? Or a better reason than that?
Leave a Reply