A huge sob piece by Sebastian Cresswell-Taylor.
The upper middle classes now face economic insecurity. A job like lawyer, doctor, architect, a generation ago provided a comfortable upper middle class life. Now it doesn’t, and the children of those who had it now experience downward social mobility. It’s all just got too expensive you see.
Good. For there’s one thing that everyone forgets in this debate. If you’re going to have upward social mobility (as I would argue we should, we want society to be open to those with rare or needed talents to prosper and rise) then given that social status is a zero sum game you also need to have the same amount of downwards social mobility.
It may well be that those talents and their rarity and demand are allocated randomly, most especially across time, so that there’s an unfairness here: what use being a near autistic operating systems programmer when there are no computers to program? In the current world that talent can bring you great fortunes, 100 years ago the poorhouse (just as an example).
But the basic point stands. That if we’re going to have upward social mobility then we also need to have downwards. The only alternative is to have no such mobility, an ossification of class position. Based, presumably, by those who might propose such a thing, on the class arrangements of whatever time left they themselves on top of the pile.
Rather ancien regime don’t you think?
Leave a Reply