Poor Georgie

The terrible thing is, he’s right, and yet he can’t see why his form of campaigning means that he’ll go on being right like this forever.

So what’s wrong with these programmes? Only that they are a formula
for environmental and humanitarian disaster. In 2004 I warned, on these
pages, that biofuels would set up a competition for food between cars
and people. The people would necessarily lose: those who can afford to
drive are richer than those who are in danger of starvation. It would
also lead to the destruction of rainforests and other important
habitats. I received more abuse than I’ve had for any other column –
except for when I attacked the 9/11 conspiracists. I was told my claims
were ridiculous, laughable, impossible. Well in one respect I was
wrong. I thought these effects wouldn’t materialise for many years.
They are happening already.

Since the beginning of last year, the
price of maize has doubled. The price of wheat has also reached a
10-year high, while global stockpiles of both grains have reached
25-year lows. Already there have been food riots in Mexico and reports
that the poor are feeling the strain all over the world. The US
department of agriculture warns that "if we have a drought or a very
poor harvest, we could see the sort of volatility we saw in the 1970s,
and if it does not happen this year, we are also forecasting lower
stockpiles next year". According to the UN food and agriculture
organisation, the main reason is the demand for ethanol: the alcohol
used for motor fuel, which can be made from maize and wheat.

Yes, bio diesel is a silly idea (ethanol from corn vastly so, from sugar cane possibly sensible)but what do you think is going to happen when you lobby politicians to change the rules? Other people will also lobby politicians, in a process known as rent seeking, to make sure that they benefit from those new rules. It’s just the way the political process works and no one has managed to make it not be so.

Ethanol from corn in the US: well, of course! hasn’t anyone remembered that the first part of the Presidential elections take place in Iowa? A place inhabited mainly by corn farmers? The EU has been held hostage by it’s farmers since its creation: what does anyone bloody well think will happen when the political types start to mandate a specific technology? Yup, right spot on, the recommendations, the regulations, will benefit the farmers.

Now George is correct here, bio diesel isn’t going to be the salvation of the planet (although the afore mentioned ethanol from sugar cane might indeed help) but it really is necessary for people like him to wake up and smell the roses. You can’t go round calling for government targets to be set without accepting that it will be politicians who set them. And they will, unfortunately, act as politicians when doing so. That is, placate the groups with political power, rather than plump for the actual solution to the problem at hand.

4 responses

  1. “[H]e can’t see why his form of campaigning means that he’ll go on being right like this forever.”
    So the push towards environmentally destructive biofuels is the fault of politicians. George Monbiot has called for regulation by politicians, and has opposed biofuels; therefore he is ultimately responsible for this phenomenon because, er, his lobbying led to opposing lobbying by companies, and they got their way. Or something equally batty.
    Suppose I accept this preposterous excuse for an argument. What would your anti-regulation, anti-politician campaigning achieve? How would your approach achieve a better environmental result than Monbiot’s “form of campaigning”? That is, how would a total absence of regulation cause companies to “plump for the actual solution to the problem at hand”?
    Tim adds: No, George pushes for regulation, but refuses to see that as regulation will be promulgated by politicians, it will always fall foul of rent seeking and public choice economics.

  2. “No, George pushes for regulation, but refuses to see that as regulation will be promulgated by politicians, it will always fall foul of rent seeking and public choice economics.”
    I fail to see what the point of this statement is, if the conclusion is not essentially what I proposed. Are you not claiming that his “form of campaigning” against biofuels has led to their promotion on account of the resulting regulation being skewed by corporate counter-lobbying? How else could his “form of campaigning” lead to his “being right [on biofuels] forever”? If this is indeed so, who was it, if not Monbiot, who, utilising his “form of campaigning”, caused the shift to government promotion of biofuels?
    In any case you offer no other solution. You appear to think that if and he and others like him stopped campaigning the environment would be destroyed less, via some magical market-based mechanism unconnected with naive attempts to “lobby politicians to change the rules”. This in spite of your implicit admission that companies have lobbied to pursue the environmentally destructive option. What is this remarkable mechanism?
    Tim adds: Pigou taxes.

  3. Ah, I see.
    So Monbiot et al’s vast influence stymied Pigovian taxes, while lobbyists for companies who presumably profit from their destructive activies, and would therefore not wish for such taxes, were not involved. How strange.
    Furthermore, once an environment friendly to the Pigovian taxes has been established — once the terrible strangehold of Guardian columnists over government policy has been broken — why then lobbying by environmentally destructive companies ceases to matter… somehow.
    Suddenly all is well: we’ll have taxes set by politicians who won’t, of course, “placate the groups with political power” as they would with regulatory schemes. And we’ll have companies labouring happily and honestly under those taxes.
    It’s all perfectly clear now. Barking mad, but clear.

  4. Forester Avatar
    Forester

    Couldn’t the Mexico Govt just reduce its tariff on over quota imports to $0? Or even remove the quota!
    http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3723/is_1_16/ai_114328146

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading