This boggles the mind:
American (and hence, sadly, British) foreign policy towards Cuba has
long been based on a single presumption: that on the death of Fidel
Castro the people will take to the streets, the current system of
government will collapse, and a regime more acceptable to American (and
hence British) interests will be ushered in.
I can’t speak for governments of course but my own hope is that the current system of government in Cuba will collapse and a regime more acceptable to the interests of the Cuban people take its place.
Castro’s ill health created the context in which power passed
seamlessly to a group of his most trusted and experienced colleagues.
From the Caudillo to the caudillettes. Most democratic, most freedom loving. You know there was another dictator who passed on power to the head of the armed forces.
For the Cuban masses who mourn Castro are not going to turn on his appointed successors.All
of these people, most of whom I know and respect, have been to the
forefront in Cuban domestic life for decades. Even if they do not
aspire to the charisma and stature of Fidel, they enjoy far more
popular recognition and support than the Americans admit.
Excellent, let them test it. We have a method you know, elections. If they do enjoy the support you claim then they’ll win (and yes, I’m aware that for most of the past 50 years Fidel would indeed have won a free election).
Believe me, these are high quality people who would be assets to any
government – and are now firmly in control of Cuba. Each of them is
ideologically committed to maintaining Cuba’s independence and
political system. But none of them is the unbending ideologue of
Washington caricature, far less an authoritarian denier of human
rights. They will display pragmatism and flexibility but will certainly
not roll over and allow the fundamental reforms of the Cuban revolution
to unravel.
Ah, I see. The turkeys won’t vote for Christmas then. Some surprise there I know. Those fundamental reforms are what got them to the top of the greasy pole so of course they won’t allow something as simple as a free election.
The Americans’ camp followers on Cuba have never been prepared to
acknowledge that a country which has lived under constant economic
siege for almost half a century, and which has been subject to more
foreign plots than any other, might be entitled to define "dissidents"
in terms that do not match those of their persecutors.
Ah, "dissidents". Those who argue for free speech, elections, a free economy, sure, because the Americans tried to kill Fidel it’s entirely correct that those simply trying to uphold the UN’s Declaration of Human Rights should be jailed.
Jeez, and to think that Wilson was a Minister in our own Government.
Leave a Reply to john bCancel reply