Obama and Clinton

The minutiae of American Presidential politics is not to everyone’s taste, to be sure. I’m certainly not all  clued in myself. However, now that we’ve got both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton announced as running (well, exploratory committees) it could in fact be interesting this time around. John Edwards is also a pretty sure fire runner.

Now, of course, I don’t want three liberals like this to get anywhere near the White House: I’d much rather Ron Paul who has just announced he’ll be running for the Republican nomination (he’s closer, much, to the classically liberal position).

But I think it’s going to be hugely, massively, fun to see the twin problems of race and gender being fought over. There’ll be those who do run entirely racially based political campaigns (the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons) claiming that Obama is not really black (I’ll lay good odds that at least some people claim that he’s not really black as he’s of direct African descent, and thus has not shared the genetic and cultural burden of slavery) and on the other side there’ll be those who fall over their own feet desperately trying to claim some reason to oppose him other than the fact that he’s black.

Similarly with Clinton and "Is America ready for a Woman President?" stuff. I’m sure it is although not this one (at least I hope not).

However, fun as all this is going to be to watch, do remember that there’s still two years to go. There might not be enough fun to cover all of that time span.

10 responses

  1. As readers of Crooks and Liars will know, Fox news have already raised one highly important question about Senator Obama’s suitability for high office: Would you vote for a president who smokes? And, if this aspect of his character were not sinister enough, Why do we never see photographs of him smoking?

  2. I nearly choked on my toast before I realised you wrote Ron Paul; because I thought you meant Ru Paul!!

  3. James of England Avatar
    James of England

    Ron Paul is anti-trade, though. I’d rather see Hillary in. Better a wealthy America with a slightly odd health system than a xenophobic America where the poor can be guaranteed that the medicine they can’t afford will be 100% American.
    Tim adds: He is? Odd to see people like Reason getting excited about him then. Perhaps I should reconsider?

  4. Jim Winfield Avatar
    Jim Winfield

    And apparently she is promoting herself as the “American Thatcher”. She may not realise that in most of the world that is not a compliment

  5. Ron Paul anti-trade? I can’t imagine that although I will do some research. As much more of a Libertarian than a Republican I would assume he would not only be free trade but also possibly carry it out to open borders, etc. Can you pls provide some links to confirm this?

  6. Ron Paul is Mr Free Trade read is bio:
    http://www.house.gov/paul/bio.shtml
    Hillary would be a protectionist nightmare.

  7. happyjuggler0 Avatar
    happyjuggler0

    James of England,
    From your post I see the disinformation campaign has already begun, although I suspect you’re not an organized part of it, and merely parroting some bovine scatology you picked up at the weekly Communist Party meeting.
    Ron Paul rocks! My only fear is that the media will rail against him on general principles since he is opposed to all the big government b.s. they are so fond of.
    If he doesn’t get elected, it is likely to be because he is too much of a free marketeer, not too little. There seems to be a backlash against free trade going on, and I have no doubt the ticket of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will demagogue against it one way or another. Your loyalties seem radically misplaced if you are truly in favor of free trade.

  8. happyjuggler0 Avatar
    happyjuggler0

    Ok, to be fair it appears at a superficial glance that Ron Paul is anti-trade, but this is deceptive. He is opposed to treaties that restrict the right to free association, and he considers Free Trade Agreements in that category. He also seems to feel that FTA’s are a violation of the US Constitution.
    I have not seen it explicitly stated, but I suspect his position on trade is that the US ought to have unilateral free trade and zero subsidies, and if other countries want to hurt themselves by doing something contrary to that, then that is their problem. Considering the state of Doha, I’d say that for utilitarian reasons that the game theory approach to increasing free trade is dead and that unilaterally ending barriers to trade is the way to go.

  9. Barack the Magic Negro

    The Guardian reports on the latest from Rush Limbaugh:The leading US shock jock Rush Limbaugh is taunting the liberal media by repeatedly airing a derogatory and racially charged song about the Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.I’m not sur…

  10. It’s test.
    I could’t post a message…

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading