Mahdi Bunting Can’t Read Reports

The Mahd Mahdi Bunting is at it again, playing fast and loose with the figures. I assume it’s because she can’t actually digest the reports she reads, rather than either not reading them or doing so and then lying.

Yet the case against the madness that is modern gambling keeps piling
up the evidence of the disastrous impact on individuals and
communities. Today, an analysis of British household expenditure
reveals that the average British family spends more on gambling than on
fresh fruit and vegetables in a week. As online gambling has boomed,
the total annual spend is now put at £800 per person in the UK on
average.

Well, here’s the figures from that report:

The Family Spending report, which is based on interviews with almost
7,000 families, reveals that £3.60 a week is spent on gambling,
compared with £3.40 on fresh vegetables, £2.80 on fresh fruit and £3.20
on holidays abroad.

So, that’s more is spent on gambling than fruit OR vegetables, not more than fruit AND vegetables.

And, as I bothered to calculate, that gambling figure is 0.81% of household income. Less than 1% of income spent on a frippery? This isn’t a problem now, is it.

That £800 per person figure by the way. Looks a little odd against average household expenditure of  £187.2 doesn’t it? Mahdi is counting money wagered, not money lost. Tsk, tsk.

So, you decide. She doesn’t understand or she’s lying?

8 responses

  1. Yes, the shocking thing is how little is spent on fruit and veg.
    Bu then, no need to worry about your health – the wonderful NHS will do that for you – that’s why we spend £30/week on it each (whether we want to or not). The BMA would like us to spend even more so that – having ensured our good health – they can now sort out our gambling problem.

  2. Agammamon Avatar
    Agammamon

    The real question is why the comparison is even important.
    If they’re getting *enough* fruit and vegetables then it doesn’t matter how much else is spent on other things – Spending more on food just gets ’em fatter.

  3. dsquared Avatar
    dsquared

    £3.40 actually buys you quite a lot of vegetables; they’re cheap.

  4. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    “£3.40 actually buys you quite a lot of vegetables”: I’ll bet Channel 4 spent more than that on them.

  5. Averages mean nothing when a large slab of the population don’t gamble, surely? What’s the median? How many gamblers are sharing those expenses? etc

  6. sortapundit Avatar
    sortapundit

    Averages mean nothing when a large slab of the population don’t gamble, surely? What’s the median? How many gamblers are sharing those expenses? etc
    For my part I lost about £25,000 gambling between ’99 and ’04 (when I quit), but I probably wagered several hundred thousand. So, I’m picking up the slack for all you lazy non-gamblers.

  7. sortapundit Avatar
    sortapundit

    In fact, looking back over that comment made me realise that I personally account for the annual gambling of almost every person on my street.
    So, it isn’t a national issue. It’s just me at my computer, frantically trying to win back my losses playing online roulette. Oh, and Mrs. Leitch at no. 32 buying her weekly lottery ticket.
    Still, I eat plenty of fruit and veg so it’ll all be OK in the end.

  8. Perhaps stupid people are putting money into fruit machines thinking an apple is going to come out, thus skewing the gambling figures?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading