More Organic Food Defenses

Of course, the Guardian would go nuts about the Boy Dave (M)’s statement that organic food is no better nutritionally.

His views were condemned as "patronising" to consumers and "insulting"
to organic farmers by the
Soil Association, the organic farmers’
organisation. Its director, Patrick Holden, said: "I actually think it
is rather sad because it suggests that David Miliband is profoundly
ignorant of the benefits that are motivating people to buy organic
food. The industry has grown without the support of the government and
we thought we finally had it on our side. I find it amazing the
minister is being so dismissive." Asked about the benefits claimed for
organic food, Mr Miliband said: "It’s a lifestyle choice that people
can make. There isn’t any conclusive evidence either way."

Peter Melchett, also of the Soil Association, said: "Half the baby food
market is organic. This isn’t just posh people making lifestyle
choices. It’s about people being worried about the quality of the food
they give their babies and worried about the use of pesticides and
antibiotics."

Agreed My Lord, but the question is whether people are being sensible to worry over the use of pesticides and antibiotics.

John Barrow, founder of the Organic Delivery Company, said he
disagreed with Mr Miliband. "I think the general public also disagree,
going by the number of new customers we have every week.

"It’s
not only the taste of organic products but the environmental benefits
and health benefits too. It is not a lifestyle choice, there are health
issues involved. I discovered organic food about 15 years ago when I
had a chronic illness and went to an alternative health practitioner. I
told him I was a vegetarian and he said ‘but your diet’s wrong, you are
not eating organic food’.

"He said I should eat food that is
grown in harmony with the planet and the seasons. I did and within a
month, my problem had gone."

Really? Anecdote is now evidence?

However, a new study shows that a pint of organic milk has on average
68% more omega 3 fatty acids, which are vital for normal brain
functioning, than conventional milk.

Indeed, and this is not a direct effect of being organic. It’s a side effect of planting clover in the pastures to fix the nitrogen.

7 responses

  1. When the most right-on, green xtreme minister of them all questions the benefits of eating organic food it can only mean one thing: pesticide manufacturers are bankrolling his party.

  2. Ian Reid Avatar
    Ian Reid

    Ah, omega 3. Whilst most of the Guardian has laid down and worshiped at the foot of this new wonder food their science editor is asking a few awkward questions http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1889728,00.html
    The lack of evidence won’t of course stop the bandwagon rolling, there are too many vested interests on board for that to happen.
    The answer is simple if you believe in placebo, or want to subsidize toffs for growing food inefficiently buy organic food. Otherwise don’t.

  3. It’s a shame that neither the minister nor his critics are focusing on the area in which organic food does bring real, tangible, verifiable benefits: the environment it is grown in.
    The biological and ecological impacts of chemical vs organic agriculture have been well-attested. If you’re interested in wildlife, biological diversity, soil conservation or other related issues, it is clear which wins out. It’s not simply a ‘consumer’ issue, and never has been.

  4. AntiCitizenOne Avatar
    AntiCitizenOne

    Paul K,
    That’s wrong. As yeilds from “organic” farming are lower, more land is needed, therefore the impact of “organic” on the environment is worse than science based farming.

  5. andrew duffin Avatar
    andrew duffin

    “It’s a side effect of planting clover in the pastures to fix the nitrogen.”
    Indeed.
    Just wondering how many other beneficial effects there might be, that you don’t know about.
    Not to mention, vice versa.

  6. dsquared Avatar
    dsquared

    [That’s wrong. As yeilds from “organic” farming are lower, more land is needed, therefore the impact of “organic” on the environment is worse than science based farming.]
    This doesn’t follow at all, particularly in a country like Britain with an agricultural landscape.

  7. I think you should pay higher prices for organic food in view of their higher levels of Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Listeria. It acts as an appropriate disincentive and presumably provides beneficial natural selection.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading