Very strange Michael Kinsley piece in The Guardian today. The thrust of the argument appears to be that Jenna and Barb Bush have a moral duty to be in the Army or something. Because, you know, Dad started this war.
Bit weird isn’t it?
Very strange Michael Kinsley piece in The Guardian today. The thrust of the argument appears to be that Jenna and Barb Bush have a moral duty to be in the Army or something. Because, you know, Dad started this war.
Bit weird isn’t it?
In
Bit like arguing that Chelsea Clinton should lead the surrender to al-Q, because it was her father’s dereliction of duty that let it thrive.
Holding the children responsible for those two dud Presidents seems a little harsh. No harm in holding Hillary partly responsible for Bill, though: her contribution to his career through the old cattle-futures stunt was noteworthy.
Leave a Reply