Quiggin On Friedman

I like this:

Friedman was effective in part because he was obviously a person of
goodwill. I never had the feeling with him, as with many writers in the
free-market line, that he was promoting cynical selfishness, or pushing
the interests of business. He genuinely believed that economics was
about making people’s lives better and that disagreements among
economists were about means rather than ends and could ultimately be
resolved by careful attention to the evidence.

The various reactions to Friedman’s death have I’m afraid simply confirmed me in some of my prejudices. There are decent people with whom I still manage to disagree, as here, and there are others not so decent as here.

4 responses

  1. Not worth bothering about the bozo who wrote the short paragraph – his view is so out of synch it doesn’t matter.

  2. “person of goodwill”: bloody pratt-speak.

  3. I don’t suppose this means that you’re going to be reconsidering the wisdom or taste of your post on JK Galbraith’s death?
    Tim adds: No, I think the tone of my post on Galbraith is fine. I actually start with the phrase nil nisi….

  4. ..and followed it with the “I’m not a racist” style “but”.
    In what way does Richard Adam’s piece fail to meet your definition of how one “in polite society, talk[s] about people between their death and their burial” and your JKG piece doesn’t?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading