Something of a startling claim from Brighton’s finest:
It is a better environment and more resources into health and education. Only government can provide these things …
Only government can provide health care? Wow, that’ll surprise the French then who have an insurance based health care system, one rather better than our own Dear NHS. Only government can provide education? Ever heard of Eton? Only government can provide a better environment? As most environmental problems are Commons Tragedies that would have surprised Garrett Hardin, who delineated the problem. As he pointed out, there can be either governmental or private solutions to such things.
I don’t doubt that government can attempt to provide all of these things but to claim that only government can is palpably absurd. The only interesting question is whether governments, in attempting to provide them, do so better than alternative methods?
That is of course an empitical question. Is the French health care system better than hte NHS? Perhaps we should adopt their model then? Is Eton better than a bog standard comprehensive? Perhaps we should adopt the former model then? The Commons Tragedy that is fishing. Norway, Iceland and the Faroes seem to have solved it, we have not. We use a purely governmental system of quotas, they use a much more market based allocation of property ownership to the catch.
Hhm. Neil doesn’t seem to be winning the arguments over those empirical questions really, does he?
Leave a Reply