Wire reports are stating that Milton Friedman has died. WSJ:
Nobel prize winner Milton Friedman, one of the most influential economists of the last century, died today. He was 94.
Mr. Friedman’s
death was also announced at a conference of the libertarian Cato
Institute in Washington by the institute’s vice president of academic
affairs, James A. Dorn. The audience of academics and policy makers
observed several moments of silence in observance
Cato Institute
Prominent free-market economist Milton Friedman,
recipient of the 1976 Nobel Prize for Economic Science, passed away
today at the age of 94. Friedman was widely regarded as the leader of
the Chicago School of monetary economics, which stresses the importance
of the quantity of money as an instrument of government policy and as a
determinant of business cycles and inflation. In addition to his
scientific work, Friedman also wrote extensively on public policy,
always with primary emphasis on the preservation and extension of
individual freedom. Friedman’s ideas hugely influenced both the Reagan
administration and the Thatcher government in the early 1980s,
revolutionized establishment economic thinking across the globe, and
have been employed extensively by emerging economies for decades.
Condolences to a couple of people on the blogs I know from the blogs: David and Patri.
More from David Smith and a link to his Nobel acceptance lecture. Matthew Sinclair has some of the Free to Choose series (unfortunately, the full version seems to have disappeared from the net).
Hedge Fund Guy has another video link and this:
He castigated the effects of teachers unions, the medical monopoly in
America, excessive monetary growth, unions, wage and price controls,
social security, public housing, welfare, etc., long before it was
fashionable. Most of these opinions were predicated on the consistent
theme that by violating an individual’s liberty, one is neglecting the
wisdom of those who are in a best position to judge the appropriateness
of a certain course of action.
And I do wish we were able to get this point over more effectively:
Many liberals characterize him and his ilk (eg, me) as mean and
indifferent to the poor, but he was a true utilitarian, for equality of
rights, he just differed on tactics.
The Cassandra Page has a series of quotes:
Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat scorned.
I’m in favor of legalizing drugs. According to my values system, if
people want to kill themselves, they have every right to do so. Most of
the harm that comes from drugs is because they are illegal.
Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much more
urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government.
The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem.
The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit.
Via Reason comes this at The Wine CommonSewer, Milton at Cinco Di Mayo this year.
There will be thousands more pieces I have no doubt. Just check Google Blogsearch and Technorati to read your fill.
Samuel Brittan in the FT:
It was not until I came across Friedman, and learned that he had spent
more time in lobbying against the US “draft” than on any other policy
issue, that I began to take seriously the wider philosophic
protestations of the pro-market economists.
Damn right, we are not slaves to be used by the State as they would wish, we are individuals who contract the State to do what we cannot do independently.
He regarded the anti-drugs laws as virtually a government subsidy for organised crime.
Does anyone think of it now as anything else?
His son David, in an attempt to avoid following in his father’s
footsteps, became at first a physicist, but eventually found the lure
of socio-economic arguments too difficult to resist. His father was
highly tolerant of David’s excursions into anarchocapitalism preferring
deviations in that direction to lapses towards the conventional left.
Obituaries aren’t really supposed to make you laugh but, umm, giggle. David is here.
The authors found that state control of entry into the medical
profession kept up the level of fees to the detriment of patients.
These findings never ceased to get under the skin of the profession.
Damn right. The beginnings of public choice theory.
But he believed that an objective study of the facts, case by case,
combined with an underlying belief in personal choice, would usually
swing the argument in favour of private provision in the market place.
Yes, I’ll buy that. In fact I have, it underpins much of my view of the interaction between economics and policy.
Milton on drugs, Virginia Postrel, Jane Galt, and the NYT obituary. Also Austan Goolsbee.
Richard Adams starts pissing in the grave before they’ve even put the body in it. Vile.
The Times‘ obituary. Something of a pity the paper has gone tabloid. The old rule of thumb was that you knew when someone really important had died. They got a full page obit in The Times.
Radley Balko has a great video piece.
The late Bernie Saffran used to say, "Milton Friedman and Paul
Samuelson teach the same price theory, but only Friedman applies it to
policy."
Division of Labour with a foreword that Friedman wrote for their book.
Mark Thoma with a Wall Street Journal piece. Published today: yes, Friedman was still writing and thinking about economics right to the end.
Houston’s Clear Thinkers have some great quotes.
When Professor Friedman moved to San Francisco in the 1970’s, the city
was debating rent control. So he wrote a letter to The San Francisco
Chronicle declaring: "Anybody who has examined the evidence about the
effects of rent control, and still votes for it, is either a knave or a
fool."
"One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their
intentions rather than their results. We all know a famous road that is
paved with good intentions. The people who go around talking about
their soft heart — I share their — I admire them for the softness of
their heart, but unfortunately, it very often extends to their head as
well, because the fact is that the programs that are labeled as being
for the poor, for the needy, almost always have effects exactly the
opposite of those which their well-intentioned sponsors intend them to
have."
I celebrate a life well-lived.
A short list of the ideas he either gave birth, nurtured or
resuscitated includes: the idea that monetary policy is even worth our
attention, skepticism of government solutions, the volunteer army,
school choice, what we now call the earned income tax credit, the lack
of an exploitable policy tradeoff between inflation and unemployment,
income tax witholding, decriminalization, flexible exchange rates, to
name just a few.
Milton Friedman loved liberty. Even today, chills run down my spine whenever I read the slashing opening to Capitalism and Freedom.
President
Kennedy said, "Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you
can do for your country."… Neither half of that statement expresses a
relation between the citizen and his government that is worthy of the
ideals of free men in a free society.
Damn right.
To explain this in a way that even those who disagree with economic
liberalism should understand: If a scholar holds a few lectures in
Myanmar or Libya, and explains that an impartial judiciary or a free
media is good and will build a foundation for democracy, that doesn´t
make this scholar a supporter of the dictatorship in Myanmar or Libya.
Ok?
And if an apolitical scientist tells the Chinese leaders that they
must deal with its environmental problems not even this makes him a
supporter of China´s dictatorship. Or is he? In that case there are a
lot of supporters of tyranny out there.
You can see the double standard here, right? The latter happens all
the time, but no one would accuse such a scholar or scientist of being
a supporter of the communist regime (or whatever regime it was). It´s
Milton Friedman´s economic views his critics hate, but because they
don´t know how to falsify them, they make up bizarre accusations about
Pinochet that they would never dream of using against anyone whose
views they share.
And this:
Several times Rose interrupted him with an opposing view. She turned out to be more hardcore in her views than he was.
The Guardian’s obituary (of all places!) is positively fulsome.
Milton Friedman, who has died aged 94, was one of the greatest
economists of all time. He may come to be included in the same category
of pre-eminent figures as Adam Smith, Ricardo, Marx and John Maynard
Keynes. When he began his main work, while professor at Chicago
University in the 1950s and 60s, Keynesian orthodoxy dominated almost
all academic macro-economics, and much of public policy in this field.
By the time Friedman’s project was mostly complete, in the 1970s and
80s – with a Nobel prize in 1976 – that orthodoxy had been shattered.
….
Yet, with his colleague Anna Schwartz, he wrote the finest ever book on
economic history, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960,
published in 1963.
Err, Harry Hutton’s view of it all:
Should we let the invisible hand caress our organ of government, as
Friedman argued, or should we reintroduce the Golden Age of Steam? What
do you think?
Mark Perry with further quotes:
10. The high rate of unemployment
among teenagers, and especially black teenagers, is both a scandal and
a serious source of social unrest. Yet it is largely a result of
minimum wage laws. We regard the minimum wage law as one of the most,
if not the most, antiblack laws on the statute books.
11.
Industrial progress, mechanical improvement, all of the great wonders
of the modern era have meant relatively little to the wealthy. The rich
in Ancient Greece would have benefitted hardly at all from modern
plumbing : running servants replaced running water. Television and
radio? The Patricians of Rome could enjoy the leading musicians and
actors in their home, could have the leading actors as domestic
retainers. Ready-to-wear clothing, supermarkets – all these and many
other modern developments woul have added little to their life. The
great achievements of Western Capitalism have redounded primarily to
the benefit of the ordinary person. These achievements have made
available to the masses conveniences and amenities that were previously
the exclusive perogative of the rich and powerful.
David Friedman‘s blog comment:
Cattle die, kindred die,
Every man is mortal:
But the good name never dies
Of one who has done well.
Patri Friedman with the Milton Friedman choir video.
Danny Finkelstein (pbuh) has up the 2 minute video of Friedman telling the I Pencil story.
William Polley with a more personal obituary.
Leave a Reply