Oh, FF’sS.

Magnus Linklater with a paen of praise to the peasant farmer;

That makes it easier for the French to wean its consumers away from
cheap imports. It is a process that will have to happen sooner or later
in Britain too. We cannot forever continue to jet in fruit and
vegetables from improbable places in the name of choice and cheapness.
If we are serious about the environment, we cannot turn a blind eye to
the ranching conditions or the deforestation in countries like Brazil
or Argentina, which supply our beef. Above all, we cannot simply allow
our farming heritage to melt away because it is out of fashion. Sooner
or later we will need it back again. When that time comes, I have no
doubt which country will be better placed. My money is on the old man
with the scythe.

Deforestation? Argentina? The whole damn place is a cow’s friggin’ dream, flat grassland for hundreds of miles!

But the pointhe’s missed, the important point. Yes, growing food uses resources. Fuel, land, all sorts of things. In fact, the traditional three inputs: land, labour and capital. You can mix and match them to your heart’s desire. More labour if you wish. More capital (machinery) if you wish. You can farm extensively (like Argentina does) or intensively (like that French peasant) using more or less land.

But what is inevitable is that if you use less land and less capital, you have to use more labour. And as labour is the most expensive input, that will make food more expensive…..and thus all those who buy it, poorer.

Sure, we can have peasant farming, terroir, if we wish to. We just have to be willing to pay for it: on top of the 1,500 quid a year per family that the CAP already costs us.

8 responses

  1. Personally, I don’t see what’s wrong in letting some farmland go back to the wild, if its no longer economical. We would have more wilderness in the UK. Would be good, I think, and would probably compensate for loss of wilderness in other countries who start developing their wilderness for agriculture.

  2. Chuckles Avatar
    Chuckles

    Last time I looked, most of the current alleged Brazilian Amazon deforestation was to grow soya?

  3. Has anyone done the carbon accounting for peasant farming? For one thing, I hardly imagine that sixty Jean-Marie Crapauds each taking his half a ton of onions to market in his ridiculous corregated iron shed on wheels will be kinder to the environment than one modern, diesel powered horse dragging a thirty ton articulated trailer.
    Peasant farming is inefficient and environmentally unfreindly. That’s why most civilised countries have stopped doing it. It’s only the southern European countries (and some dipstick greenies elsewhere) who have this romantic idea that if we all went back to the land everything would suddenly be okay.
    Peasant farming also ties the peasants to the land, denying them opportunities elsewhere. Hardly the sort of thing a “progressive” thinker would want, surely?

  4. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    “We cannot forever continue to jet in fruit and vegetables from improbable places in the name of choice and cheapness.” I’m SO looking forward to Shetland bananas, brought south by coracle.

  5. Nah, it’ll never happen, Dearie. The high winds prevalent in the Shetlands will cause the bananas to bend beyond the permitted curvature and the coracles won’t pass any number of safety and hygene regulations.
    You’ll be stuck with eating brussels sprouts when they are in season and mud for the rest of the time.

  6. An alternative to returning land to wilderness would be letting people build homes. We have homes many times more expensive, in real terms not just money ones, partly because land has to be “conserved” from use by human beings.

  7. Neil – I agree. Lets build on the precious countryside. Let market forces prevail.
    Why let all the rural types have the countryside all to themselves the cheeky beggars. Plus – it might bring the market to them for them to sell their expensive peasantry wares to us punters, rather than having to expensively chug them into farmers markets in cities.
    Something like 95% of UK land area is classed as rural. So why not take a bit more of that up for our nice homes with big drives and gardens etc.

  8. dsquared Avatar
    dsquared

    [Last time I looked, most of the current alleged Brazilian Amazon deforestation was to grow soya?]
    Yes, but the soya is mainly used for animal feed so I would not get too worked up about this one. It is real deforestation btw, the trees are cut down and do not grow back.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading