No, I’m not talking about last week’s election in Iraq. I mean the recent developments here at home, in the United States.

President Bush, who bloodied John McCain in the brutal Republican
primary in South Carolina in 2000, had to cry uncle last Thursday and
accept Senator McCain’s demand that the U.S. ban cruel, inhumane and
degrading treatment of prisoners in American custody.

It was an embarrassing defeat for the Bush administration, which, in
its high-handed approach to governing, has shown no qualms about
trampling the fundamental tenets of a free, open and democratic society.

But worse was to come for the president. On Thursday night, The New
York Times disclosed that Mr. Bush had secretly authorized the National
Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United
States to search for terrorist activity ”without the court-approved
warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying.”

Warrants? Why bother with warrants?

The Times article reminded me of the famous scene from ”The Treasure
of the Sierra Madre” in which the character played by Humphrey Bogart
asks to see the badges of a group of Mexican bandits posing as
government officials.

Incredulous, one of the bandits says: ”We don’t need no badges. I don’t have to show you any stinking badges.”

Mr. Bush apparently feels the same way about warrants. He said over the
weekend that he had no intention of changing his eavesdropping policy.

Stubbornness is a well-known trait of this president. But increasing
numbers of Americans are objecting to the administration’s contemptuous
attitude toward liberty and the law. On Friday, the Senate blocked
reauthorization of the Patriot Act because of its dangerous intrusions
on privacy and threats to civil liberties.

The domestic eavesdropping authorized by President Bush was an
important and at times emotional part of the floor debate over the
Patriot Act. ”You want to talk about abuses?” said Senator Russell
Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat. ”I can’t imagine a more shocking
example of an abuse of power, to eavesdrop on American citizens without
first getting a court order based on some evidence that they are
possibly criminals, terrorists or spies.”

Mr. Feingold worried that we were playing into the hands of terrorists
by giving up such quintessentially American values as ”freedom,
justice and privacy.”

The Bush version of American values, as least with regard to the
so-called war on terror, has been a throwback to the Middle Ages.
Detainees were herded like animals into the prison at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, where many were abused and denied the right to challenge — or
even hear — the charges against them. Whether they were innocent or
guilty made no difference. How’s that for an American value?

Others were swept up in that peculiar form of justice called
extraordinary rendition. That’s when someone is abducted by Americans
and sent off to a regime skilled in the art of torture. I spent a
little time in Ottawa with Maher Arar, a family man from Canada who was
kidnapped at Kennedy Airport and taken to Syria.

He wasn’t a terrorist and he hadn’t done anything wrong, but that was
no defense against the sweeping madness of the Bush antiterror policies.

”It was so scary,” Mr. Arar told me. ”After a while I became like an animal.”

Another blow to America’s self-proclaimed standing as a pillar of moral
values was the revelation that the C.I.A. has been operating a
super-secret network of prisons overseas, presumably for terror
suspects. If someone who is innocent gets caught in that particular
hell, too bad. The inmates have been deprived of all rights.

This is dangerous territory, indeed. Nightmarish territory. These secret prisons are the dungeons of the 21st century.