Maureen Dowd: W’s Head in the Sand.

Maureen Dowd is on something of a roll today, managing to get straight past the sub editors with this delightful line:

But as Dexter Filkins reported in yesterday’s New York Times, there are
dozens, perhaps as many as a hundred, groups fighting the U.S. Army in
Iraq, and they have little, if anything, in common.

Forgive me for being a touch pedantic but I would regard fighting the US Army, as 99.9% of the world’s population do not, as having something in common.

Tag

In the Christmas spirit, the time has come for the reality-based community to reach out to the White House.

The Bush warriors are so deluded, they’re even faking their fakery.

This
week, the president presented a plan-like plan for ”victory” in Iraq,
which Scott McClellan rather pompously called the unclassified version
of their supersecret master plan. But there would be no way to achieve
victory from this plan even if it were a real plan. If this is what
they’re telling themselves in the Sit Room, we’re in bigger trouble
than we thought.

Talk about your unknown unknowns,
as Rummy would say.

The
National Strategy for Victory must have come from the same P.R. genius
who gave President Top Gun the ”Mission Accomplished” banner about 48
hours before the first counterinsurgency war of the 21st century broke
out in Iraq.

It’s not a military strategy — classified or
unclassified. It’s political talking points — and not even good ones.
Are we really supposed to believe that anybody, even the most deeply
delusional Bush sycophant, believes the phrase ”Our strategy is
working”?

The president talked about three neatly definable
groups of insurrectionists. But as Dexter Filkins reported in
yesterday’s New York Times, there are dozens, perhaps as many as a
hundred, groups fighting the U.S. Army in Iraq, and they have little,
if anything, in common.

Mr. Bush’s presentation claimed that the
U.S. was actually making progress in Iraq. But outside the
Bush-Cheney-Rummy bubble, 10 more marines were killed by a roadside
bomb outside Falluja, for a total of 2,125 U.S. military deaths so far.

The
administration must realize it needs a real exit strategy, because it’s
advertising for one. The U.S. Agency for International Development is
offering more than $1 billion for anyone — anyone at all — who can
come up with a plan to pacify and rebuild 10 Iraqi cities seen as vital
in the war.

Maybe the White House should apply — Usaid’s proffer says the ”invitation is open to any type of entity.”

When
Bush officials weren’t telling us fairy tales about the big, bad W.M.D.
in Iraq, they were assuring us that the unprovoked war would be a
kindness for Iraq, giving it democracy. But they are not just failing
to bring democracy to Iraq as they help Iranian-backed mullahs install
an Islamic republic with Saddamist torture chambers. They are also
degrading democracy in America.

They’ve tarnished American moral leadership with
illegal detentions, torture, secret C.I.A. prisons in countries only
recently liberated from the Soviet gulag, and Soviet-style propaganda
both at home and in Iraq.

Guess the Bush administration didn’t
learn anything this fall when federal auditors said it had violated the
law by buying favorable news coverage of its education polices. Bush
officials got right back into the fake news business, paying to plant
propaganda in the Iraqi press. They outsourced this disinformation
campaign to something called the Lincoln Group — have they no shame?

You
have to admire Scott McClellan, the president’s spokesman. He kept a
straight face when he called the U.S. ”a leader when it comes to
promoting and advocating a free and independent media around the
world.” He added, ”We’ve made our views very clear when it comes to
freedom of the press.”

Exceedingly clear. The Bushies don’t believe in it. They disdain the whole democratic system of checks and balances.

At
the Naval Academy, President Bush talked about how well the Iraqi
security forces were fighting. He claimed that 40 Iraqi battalions were
taking the lead in the fight against insurgents, and that in the battle
of Tal Afar this year, ”the assault was primarily led by Iraqi
security forces — 11 Iraqi battalions backed by 5 coalition battalions
providing support.”

Anderson Cooper of CNN swiftly produced Time magazine’s Baghdad bureau chief, Michael Ware, who was embedded with the U.S.
military during the entire Tal Afar battle. ”With the greatest respect
to the president, that’s completely wrong,” Mr. Ware said, adding: ”I
was with Iraqi units right there on the front line as they were
battling with Al Qaeda. They were not leading.”

He also told
Mr. Cooper: ”I have had a very senior officer here in Baghdad say to
me that there’s never going to be a point where these guys will be able
to stand up against the insurgency on their own.”

Mr.
Ware recalled that in a battle two weeks ago, he saw an Iraqi security
officer put down his weapon and curl up into a ball when he was under
attack. ”I have seen that on — on many, many occasions,” he said.

Curling up in a ball. Good National Strategy for Victory.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading