The latest little piece of lunacy enthusiastically supported by our John Prescott.
Ministers believe the planning system can be used to
create sustainable suburbs, with developers being expected to encourage
biodiversity with an abundance of creepers, ponds and flowers.
But
although the suburb as a whole would have a lush green feel, the
traditional garden would be confined to history, with individual houses
having little more than a backyard.
Mmmmhm hmm. Those delightful "communal areas" in the planned estates eh? The common gardens that are so carefully maintained by council workers across the land? What is this, are they expecting some sort of Nu Labour Man to develop? England (especially) is a country almost defined by the passionate attachment to gardening…..just look at the bloody TV schedules to see that.
There are plenty of places in the world where this isn’t true. Look at property ads for Spain or Portugal for example, and the properties for sale to the locals (sorry, intended for such for all are of course available to all) and you’ll see that gardens are rarely there, especially in urban areas.
Now this may or may not be a good thing. It might be more environmentally friendly to have these communal areas, but don’t you think this is a rather top down approach? You know, rather "we know what’s best for you" rather than "what do the people want"? Perhaps rather driven by ideology (oooh, private property bad, communal good)?
Perhaps, in a country where Alan Titchmarch and that redhead without a bra are national heroes, we might describe this diktat that there shall be no gardens as insane?
And finally, without gardens, where are the proles to grow their own vegetables as Georges Monbiot and the like insist we all should? Perhaps the planning guidlines of the 1920s were better? A poor man required a quarter acre of garden so that he could feed his family and keep a pig. And council houses were indeed built to those standards.
Leave a Reply