So, some academics use an intruiging method to estimate cocaine usage in London.
The Thames is awash with cocaine as Londoners snort more than 150,000 lines of the class A drug every day.
The
figure is 15 times higher than official Home Office statistics and
equates to four out of every 100 people regularly taking cocaine, or up
to 250,000 of the capital’s six million residents.
OK, so drugs usage is much higher than official figures.
Anti-drug campaigners said last night that the findings showed that
cocaine use was a ticking "health-care time bomb" and called for the
Government to take drastic action.
One thought is, if usage really is 15 times previous estimates then the drug isn’t actually as dangerous as all that then, is it? Like, perhaps, in its effects on the general health of the population, 15 times less than previously reported?
The other is "drastic action". Like what? Banging up drug dealers? Confiscating the property and money of anyone we think, but can’t prove, might be a drug dealer? Don’t we already do these things?
Drastic action would be to accept that people are going to do these things, even in the face of these serious penalties, and work to reduce the effects rather than bluster about "getting serious".
Legalize the damn stuff and then tax it.
Leave a Reply