Sir Tom Hunter and Development Ideas.

From this article by Michael Holman it looks like Sir Tom Hunter is spending 100 million of his own money on development in Africa.

“This is about enabling developing communities,”
said Sir Tom,” empowering them to define and deliver the solutions that
best fit their needs. We aim to support communities and large regions
in gaining a foothold on the first rung of the development ladder …
initially we will identify two countries (one in Africa) where a major
regional pilot programme will take place incorporating, as necessary,
interventions in education, health, infrastructure, agriculture and
entrepreneurial support in an integrated, holistic approach defined and
delivered by the local community.”

Great, as one who has argued consistently for more private involvement thiscan only be a good idea. But I do think he’s missing a trick or two. For example, how did Sir Tom make his millions (really….I have no idea)? I have a vague suspicion that if he invested that dosh in trying to recreate that business success then greater good would be done. Holman also has slightly different ideas:

Maintaining skills requires books. But the
product of western publishing houses are out of reach of  African
readers, for they cost a month’s wage. Yet with modest help from
publishers and authors, locally printed editions can be produced for a
tenth of the UK price. Lift this de facto tax on ideas, and it is more
likely that Africans will come up with their own answers to the
continent’s woes.

That sounds good to me. (In fact, if there is an NGO out there with a budget to do this  I’d love to get involved…Arabic translations   might also be a good idea.) Although this doesn’t sound quite so good:

We are told that Sir Tom is motivated by the
example of the Scottish industrialist and philanthropist, Andrew
Carnegie, who declared that “a man who dies rich, dies disgraced”.
Spend your money on Africa by all means, Sir Tom, but spend it wisely.
Use your "seed money" on restocking African universities’ run-down
libraries. One hundred million dollars will go a long way – and unlike
your well-intentioned plan, can do no harm.

It’s primary education that shows the greatest returns, not tertiary.

4 responses

  1. Built up and then sold a chain of sports (equipment?) shops apparently…
    DK

  2. He’s part of a gaggle of “businessmen” in the Phillip Green orbit, lots of finanical engineering in and around the retail and property sectors. All rather opaque but I’m sure completely above board.

  3. Chris harper Avatar
    Chris harper

    The best use of his money would be to mount a campaign explaining how much better off everyone would be if the CAP were scrapped. Imagine, a ten year 100 million education campaign on the benefits to Africa of being allowed to sell their produce to us.
    Sigh, dream on.

  4. Andrew Duffin Avatar
    Andrew Duffin

    He made his dosh by building up a chain of sportswear shops in Scotland, which he then sold for a huge pile, to a competitor who promptly closed most of them down, throwing 00’s of people out of their jobs.
    Unsurprisingly, this attracted a lot of hostility in the West of Scotland and maybe what he is doing now is now trying to make some sort of amends.
    I am sure his motives are genuinely philanthropic, but it’s worrying that he is so closely involved with various State-led organisations.
    That way lies waste and disappointment, as we all know.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading