Education Reform.

Ruth Kelly announces changes to the way that schools are run.

PARENTS’ groups will receive public money to run
their own schools under plans being drawn up by Ruth Kelly, the
Education Secretary.

Ms Kelly told local government leaders yesterday that she intended
to end their dominance of state education by inviting other groups to
open and run schools. A White Paper this autumn will include radical
proposals to replace failing schools with ones run by parents,
companies or charities.

Ms Kelly’s radical proposals indicate Tony
Blair’s determination to accelerate the pace of education reform in his
final term and could end 60 years of local government control of
education, which has seen the growth of town hall empires resistant to
reform.

The aim is to transfer power from bureaucrats to parents, to
force schools to respond more rapidly, and to overturn the Labour
orthodoxy that councils should control education.

The problem with this is that it is the usual half-baked wurble from the Nu Labour crowd. They’re not suggesting that the town hall empires be dismantled, just that they should now take a more advisory rather than managerial role. And they still get to allocate the money. Has anyone ever actaully managed to reform a bureaucracy that way?

You can see what they’re trying to do, get more parents and less bureaucrats involved. But they don’t quite have the courage of their convictions. We already know how to do this. It’s called education vouchers. Like the Swedish system. It’s all already there, been working for a decade and a half. Just copy that.

Ooops! Of course, we can’t do that, can we?  The Tories muttered something about doing that.

Never mind that it’s the right thing to do we must not do what our political oppoenents half-heartedly suggested.

Bollocks. If it’s a good idea why not bloody do it?

7 responses

  1. I agree with you on vouchers, but this idea nevertheless has real promise. My wife teaches at a school that has been set up from scratch in the past few years, on a shoestring, by parents for their children with no public money, and it provides a far better education than the local state schools, despite the handicap of the group’s somewhat eccentric religion.
    Any school set up under this plan will be a constant battleground between parents and local or central authorities, but that’s no bad thing – it will put the day-to-day conflict between freedom and bureacracy onto the front pages.

  2. Anthony Jay’s Yes minister article in the Telegraph answered it all perfectly. The bureaucracy exists to ensure it exists. School vouchers, everyone wins ‘cept the bureaucrats. That is the battleground.

  3. How about educational loans instead of vouchers.
    Making parents pay for their own childrens education will ensure they get some value from them.
    People who care about their childrens education pay for their children to be educated.

  4. Pat Patterson Avatar
    Pat Patterson

    New York tried a similar experiment and are just now exerting some kind of central authority over the schools. What happened is that the local unions, teachers, janitors, principals, etc., simply ran the schools as a jobs program for relatives. The parents are for a few years the teachers and the unions are forever.

  5. Andrew Duffin Avatar
    Andrew Duffin

    It looks pretty suspicious that she says they will “invite” other groups to run schools.
    In other words, you won’t be invited unless you’re a “suitable” (ie, goodthinking) person or organisation. And who will be doing the inviting? Let me guess – Local Authority Education Departments.
    It’ll just be “other barons who would understand” all over again.
    But hey, it’s a start, let us not sneer just yet.

  6. On looking in more detail, I think the problem is that they’re talking about taking over failing schools. A better approach would be to encourage people to start their own schools from scratch, like the one I referred to. The carcass of a crap school isn’t an asset, it’s a liability.

  7. “could end 60 years of local government control of education, which has seen the growth of town hall empires resistant to reform.”
    Shirley the problem is of too much tinkering called reform..middle schools, ITA (remeber that abortion in the 70’s), Nuffield maths , etc etc.,

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading