Drug Wars.

John Tierney is again talking sense on the Drug Wars:

During the war on drugs in the 1980’s and 1990’s, federal and local
agents risked their lives going after drug gangs on the streets. As
their budgets for drug enforcement soared, they arrested hundreds of
thousands of people annually and filled a quarter of American prison
cells with drug offenders.

But what did they have to show for
it? Drugs remained as available as ever on the streets – and actually
got a lot cheaper. The street price of heroin and cocaine dropped by
more than half in the last two decades. Dealers just went on dealing,
not only lowering their prices but also selling stronger, purer
versions of heroin, cocaine and marijuana.

Given this record, and
the pressure from Congress to show results, it’s understandable that
the Drug Enforcement Administration and local police departments hit on
a new strategy: defining deviancy up. Federal and local authorities
shifted their focus to doctors and the new scourge of OxyContin and
similar painkillers, known generally as opioids.

As quarry for
D.E.A. agents, doctors offered several advantages over crack dealers.
They were not armed. They were listed in the phone book. They kept
office hours and records of their transactions. And unlike the typical
crack dealer living with his mother, they had valuable assets that
could be seized and shared by the federal, state and local agencies
fighting the drug war.

Legalize the damn things now. The damage being done by the War on Drugs is vastly greater than that done by the drugs themselves.

In

2 responses

  1. When asked by his son why bigamy was illegal, the father replied, “Son, the law must protect those who cannot protect themselves!”
    Similarly, with a lack of both self-esteem and self-control prevalent amongst many segments of our society, the law must stand against the wider use and dispersal of illegal drugs. The classification lowering of marijuana should be reversed, the posession and distribution of all types of illegal substances should be punished by mandatory sentencing and confiscation of family assets, because only when the punishment really does fit the crime, will the criminals learn that this sort of crime simply does not pay!
    A small proportion of the huge sums supposedly allocated to I.D. cards should instead be devoted to the detection and suppression of illegal drug distribution,
    Tim adds: Mike, I understand what you’re saying. Now please try to understand me. We’ve tried what you are talking about. It doesn’t work. So we need to do something different.

  2. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    I’d probably approve of repression as a drugs policy if it worked. It doesn’t.
    We can’t even keep the foul muck out of prisons.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading