Blogcritics UK.

I’ve got an opportunity to set up a subset, a country specific part, of Blogcritics. This isn’t something set in stone as yet but it’s an idea that’s been discussed recently.

We would be hosted on the Blogcritics site and very definitely be part of their umbrella organisation.

However, I think there’s a value to add by being much more UK centric.

OK, now, there’ll be a little money raised by Amazon links, advertising and the like, which will pay for the infrastructure. But there won’t be anything like enough to be paying contributors, just as there isn’t with the US site.

So, the question is, who would like to write for it?

There’s a couple of things that might make it more attractive. I shall be beating the bushes to get review copies for people (I’ve already got the logistics of that worked out) so there should be a good supply of interesting (and free!) books (books to start with, moving on to CDs and DVDs as soon as poss.) available for review. So that’s the first thing, we’ll be getting copies of books you want to read anyway, in return for which you write a review.

I’ll also be pushing the site, when up and running, to the various regional newspapers and smaller magazines in the UK. I’m hoping that some of them will start to pick up reviews for their own use. The relationship here will be that they contract (and pay) directly to you. We’re not going to try and take a cut. Yes, I know, these reviews can be badly paid, Literary Review pays about 40 quid if you’re lucky, others pay better. The major papers are NUJ rates which are considerably better. (And yes, I’m damn certain that Sam Leith, the Telegraph books editor will at least skim those pages….he’s already been giving advice).

If that goes well we’ll try a deal with a syndication service to make things easier.

For those who want to be or think they already should be writing for the majors a little tip. Reviews can be a good way into the system.

There is also the American thingie, Pajamas Media, coming. They will be trying to syndicate such things to the papers worldwide. The financial model I haven’t seen yet but Blogritics themselves are part of it and I’ve also had brief contact with Roger L. Simon on the subject (the answer was, yes, interesting).

So there may, as I say, may, be methods for actually making a little money out of more formal sales of reviews that are written for the new site.

Plus, of course, that bright shiny new copy of something you wanted to read already.

Now, in order for me to be successful in getting review copies I need to be able to convince the publicizers that this is more than just wanting free copies. That there is a system, an  allocation system, and that the reviewers are at least literate.

So, could you email me/make a comment to this post giving your willingness to be part of this? The only commitment you are making is that if there is something you want to review, and we send it to you, that you will in fact write a review.

I need to know your name and the URL of your blog.

Just to let you know, Clive Davis has also been giving advice and will be joining us, not least in giving some brief tips on how more formal reviews should be structured. As he writes such for both the Washington and London Times (and many other places in the past) this should be helpful.

My rough take is that I need to gather 50 serious names before I start to talk to the PR people about getting copies. So, can you spread the word? Not only join up yourselves but also write this up for your readers? I’m sending emails to those I assume would want to join but of course, there’s tens of thousands more bloggers out there than I know about who might be interested.

It doesn’t matter whether your interest is in historical romance, sci-fi, literary novels, politics, economics, psychology, baroque music, whatever. There’s 80,000 new titles a year published in the UK and I’m hoping that we’ll get a good cross section, even if we don’t get all of them (!). 

Over to you. Who wants to join or who has any further questions?

Oh, one thing I should make plain. This is not an ideologically based site. Obviously, whatever you want to put into a review is fine but there are no groupthink hurdles to overcome before joining. Don’t be put off by my own prejudices.

42 responses

  1. OK, first sign up is Pootergeek via email.

  2. Count me in!

  3. I’m up for it.

  4. Put me on the waiting list!

  5. I’m also now posting at Silent Running in Oz/NZ so would like another way into wider exposure. Ready to crit anything you send my way from the viewpoint of Attila the Hun Mark 2….which would make reviewing Cherie Blar’s next book interesting…..count me in!

  6. Count me in!
    I used to review theatre for a couple of Edinburgh Fringe papers and would be happy to join in. Come to think of it, I know some publications that would probably like to use the reviews.

  7. Does Ireland count?

  8. Popular Science, or as it’s more commonly seen “Unpopular Science”, seems like a reviewable topic.

  9. Sign me up, Tim. Will you mail to the US?

  10. Please count me in

  11. I’m game. Thanks.

  12. Consider me reference-pointed.

  13. Um well…

  14. Sounds interesting. As long as I don’t have to read the latest Harry
    Potter of course…
    My book club amongst my Uni mates fell apart when I got them to read
    the epic of Gilgamesh, so I’m needing an outlet.
    As an aside, it might be intersting to get left leaning people to read
    right leaning books and visa versa – so we break out of our little
    echo chambers.
    So, yes, I’m up for it…

  15. I’ve already been doing this kind of thing with some success, so definitely count me in.
    This is a fantastic idea – it’ll do more than anything else this year to boost the British blogosphere. Especially given the quietude that has descended since 7/07. I know we’re cool heads, but really…

  16. What the hell, even though I feel like I’ve joined a Polish bread queue.

  17. David Wildgoose Avatar
    David Wildgoose

    And me, I’m game.

  18. I don’t know if an American living in England will qualify, but if so, I’d be happy to do this. I write (wrote being more accurate, perhaps) women’s fiction myself and have critiqued quite a few manuscripts.

  19. Yep, sounds like a good wheeze. I like Robin Grant’s idea “to get left leaning people to read right leaning books and visa versa”. Know your enemy, that’s what I say.

  20. BLOGGERATI

    Everyone’s a critic, so they say. Tim W comes up with a very good idea.

  21. I’d be interested…I’;d even go as far as the new Harry Potter :o)

  22. I’ll have a go…

  23. Stick my name down for this – I’d be more than happy to contribute to it. I used to write reviews for all and sundry several years ago, so it’ll be good to get back into the habit. Not so bothered about the national exposure, I just like writing, reading, watching and listening to things.

  24. I’d be interested. Got any Russian fiction to review?

  25. I’ll give it a crack if you’ll have me. Preferred topics: anything to do with crime and death. Or history. Which amounts to the same thing, mostly.

  26. I have nearly finished colouring in all my books so would be happy to have some new ones – as long as the reviews can be in crayon…

  27. One more shoulder to the millstone…

  28. Only a short review as I have only just finished – but don’t you agree the new Harry Potter is a bit disappointing – I found the characterisations still flat, in fact less rounded than before. The formula is getting a little tired maybe and as for the hyped surprise, I think we all knew beforehand, and it is flagged through out with monotonous regularity, so that at the end it is with boredom that we read of the death of….. aaargh – OK you can have the copy back, I only borrowed it from the warehouse….

  29. I would be willing to take part, think it is a great idea.

  30. Count me in.
    I have an inside track on the “books for very small children”. Probably about my intellectual level and about all I have time to read.
    There is a compelling new anthology of the “Spot” genre which needs to be brought to a wider audience.
    Oh, and I fervently hope you WILL be put off by _my_ prejudices.
    HP out tonight: will get it before disappearing southwards for a well deserved hol.
    Toodle Pip
    PG

  31. Yes. I’ll put my name down for that.

  32. I’m in. Anything about Communism, the Kennedy assassination, the Kibbo Kift, UFOs, Autonomia Operaia, the films of Lindsay Anderson, punk, Nick Drake, the British Union of Fascists, hippies, anarchism, the early Auden, the Situationists, Vichy France or Buffy the Vampire Slayer would be great.

  33. Tom Kratman Avatar
    Tom Kratman

    I’d be willing to give it a go and see how things work out. Note, however, that I am pretty much conflicted out of reviewing sci fi. I could do history, the military, or politics. Further note that I probably don’t have a non-ideological cell in my body.
    Tom

  34. Blogcritics UK — become a book reviewer…

    Tim Worstall is busy setting up a UK subsection of Blogcritics, a blog that is dedicated to letting bloggers submit book reviews. If you’re interested in reviewing books then hop over there. The only commitment you need to make is that if you spot a …

  35. Me too, obviously.

  36. Yeah, I’m up for that too.

  37. iceman Avatar
    iceman

    A whole lotta words “Whats you agenda?”

  38. me! me! pick me coach!

  39. Please stick my name in the hat.

  40. Yes please. Non-fiction ‘vulgarisation’, particularly history, biographies, anything to do with food, Paxo-esque numbers such as ‘The English’.
    Not so good with fiction esp. chick lit which I despise. Ptah Ptah.

  41. Do we get to review Big and Bouncy?

  42. Big, Bouncy and fully furry

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading