Monbiot on PFI.

He’s right you know, the Private Finance Initiative is a right old dog’s breakfast. He doesn’t actually offer a solution, I’m sure because he regards it as obvious, to stop the PFI and return to direct public funding.

So what has the
government learned from all this? Nothing. It is ideologically
committed to part-privatisation. It won’t disclose how much it is
planning to spend on PFI schemes – a spokesperson at the Treasury says
this is "commercially confidential" – but it is locked into £3.6bn of
new deals this year. According to a spokesman for the Department of
Health: "The government has no intention of abandoning PFI." The heap
of blood and feathers, though brain dead, keeps running.

So
the government fobs us off with spin, misreporting and lies. PFI, the
Treasury tells us, "is a small but important part of the government’s
strategy for delivering high-quality public services". Small? £42bn has
been officially committed so far. This, according to the
public-spending specialist Professor Allyson Pollock, is an
underestimate, covering only the 43% of PFI contracts classified as
"off balance sheet".

There is, of course, another alternative. Actually make it private, make the financiers actually bear the real risks.

One response

  1. Actually taking it private could well result in more ‘Railtracks’. Only this time schools and hospitals will go bust and, if a privatising government sticks to its guns, people – particularly poor people – will be left without provision.
    If a Sunglasses Shack goes bust, so what if the people of a town have to wait until another retailer steps into the void before they can buy their sunglasses. If a school goes bust – and if these private schools are maximising profit by operating at maximum capacity – then there is nowhere for people to go, and time set aside for education is lost.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading