Madeleine Bunting pulls something of a surprise today. It’s almost as if she’s read an economics book at some time (something of a first for Groan columnists) for she seems to have grasped, in the context of teenage pregnancy, the concept of opportunity costs.
So when a girl at 17
decides to go ahead and have a baby, there is no tragedy of lost
opportunity other than the local checkout till waiting for her low-paid
labour. Why is it that in Labour’s crusade against teenage pregnancy,
it can’t recognise that some of these teen mums are making reasonable –
even moral – decisions about what they value in life, and what they
want to do with their lives? How did opting for baby and motherhood
over shelf-stacking ever become a tragedy?
If only we could get her to recognise such concepts when she tackles other subjects, and her sorry crew of co-writers to recognise it at all.
Leave a Reply