Sometimes….

Sometimes, the old ways really were the best:

Pilot schemes starting in June will expand the number
of long-term addicts given injectable heroin if they fail to respond to
other treatments such as methadone.

Ministers have
been advised by drug treatment specialists that the introduction of
"heroin clinics" in Switzerland and Holland during the 1990s
significantly reduced drug-related crime and other social problems.
…..
In the 1970s, 20 per cent of heroin addicts who received NHS treatment
were given the Class A drug. This has fallen to less than 0.5 per cent.

Now I’m one of those extremists who think that the stuff should be legal anyway for two reasons. It’s no damn business of the Government what people put into their bodies, each of us should be free to go to hell and damnation in our own way. The second is that it is the very illegality that causes most of the problems.

Still, accepting that no politician is brave enough to actually say all of this (and it would also appear to be illegal under various UN things we have signed up to), the best solution would be to have de facto legalisation. Register as an addict and get it on prescription. Pharmaceutical heroin is so damn cheap, once you’ve taken the gangsters out of the numbers, that the NHS would actually make a profit on dispensing it at the normal prescription price. Now all we need is to write up the prescription forms for pot, cocaine, crack, meth, E and the rest. Problem solved.

5 responses

  1. Rub-a-Dub Avatar
    Rub-a-Dub

    Hasn’t this legalisation happened in Portugal? How has it worked out?
    Tim adds : The Portuguese didn’t go quite this route. They’ve created non-interference zones, they don’t arrest small time dealers and customers in certain areas. They will arrest foreigners who attempt to take part. Still got the gangs, the violence and the high prices, thus the theiving etc. as well, plus AIDS ravaging those who share needles.

  2. Speaking as a Marxist (and how many comments on this blog have begun with those words?) I’m often left frothing at the mouth by stuff I read here. But I think the mouth-frothing episodes are rather less frequent – and I’m sure the posts I agree with 100% are more frequent – than when I’m reading Norman Geras or Harry’s Place. (This, incidentally, was a 100%er.) What this means I’m not sure, except that I’m going to carry on calling myself a libertarian Marxist – if only because of the way it irritates, well, almost everybody.
    Tim adds: Roaming round, as I do, I find myself increasingly agreeing with people like Chris Dillow and John Band…left libertarians you might say (Chris certainly defines himself that way, not sure about John), rather than Tories/Lib Dems/ Labour . I’m often seen as some sort of hanging and flogging Tory and the truth is most of my views would horrify those types. I despise the social conservatives just as much as I am agog at the economic stupidity of the Statist Left.

  3. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    Drugs: I see the case for repression. I see the case for liberty. I see no case for repression that does not work. Heavens, we can’t even keep drugs out of jails!

  4. David Wildgoose Avatar
    David Wildgoose

    Commenting on your comment Tim, I consider myself a (slightly) left Libertarian, which unfortunately makes me completely homeless politically.
    I’m not sure what the answer is, but fairer voting systems that allowed more subtle political distinctions to emerge would be a good start.

  5. Apparantly we spend as a nation £6.6bln a year on cannabis. The average cannabis smoker pays £498! And there’s 3million of them.
    Sounds to me like there’s some money to be made there.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading