Steyn on the UN and the Tsunami.

Nice piece here.

If America were to emulate Ireland and Norway, there’d
be a lot more dead Indonesians and Sri Lankans. Mr Eddison may not have
noticed, but the actual relief effort going on right now is being done
by the Yanks: it’s the USAF and a couple of diverted naval groups
shuttling in food and medicine, with solid help from the Aussies,
Singapore and a couple of others. The Irish can’t fly in relief
supplies, because they don’t have any C-130s. All they can do is wait
for the UN to swing by and pick up their cheque.
The
Americans send the UN the occasional postal order, too. In fact, 40 per
cent of Egeland’s budget comes from Washington, which suggests the
Europeans aren’t being quite as "proportionate" as Mr Eddison thinks.
But, when disaster strikes, what matters is not whether your cheque is
"prompt", but whether you are. For all the money lavished on them, the
UN is hard to rouse to action. Egeland’s full-time round-the-clock 24/7
Big Humanitarians are conspicuous by their all but total absence on the
ground. In fact, they’re doing exactly what our reader accused
Washington of doing – Colin Powell, wrote Mr Eddison, "is like a
surgeon saying he must do a bandage count before he will be in a
position to staunch the blood flow of a haemorrhaging patient". That’s
the sclerotic UN bureaucracy. They’ve flown in (or nearby, or overhead)
a couple of experts to assess the situation and they’ve issued press
releases boasting about the assessments. In Sri Lanka, Egeland’s staff
informs us, "UNFPA is carrying out reproductive health assessments".
Which, translated out of UN-speak, means the Sri Lankans can go screw themselves.

Transnational, collective action is so much more effective, isn’t it?

13 responses

  1. A pack of lies from Steyn, and you make yourself look like an idiot by repeating them.

  2. perhaps Jim might like to tell us which bits are lies and thus prevent us all looking like idiots?

  3. Tom Livingston Avatar
    Tom Livingston

    It’s an hour since Mark’s post but no news yet on Steyn’s lies from Jim – funny that, I bet Jim reads the Independent for Pilger’s “truth”.

  4. “It’s an hour since Mark’s post but no news yet on Steyn’s lies from Jim – funny that”
    Yeah, it is funny, because (unlike you, apparently), I’ve been off doing other things. I don’t hang around blogs all day you know. Maybe you should get out a bit more yourself.
    “It’s an hour since Mark’s post but no news yet on Steyn’s lies from Jim – funny that”
    You’d have lost that bet.
    Now, to Steyn’s lies: basically, he has selectively quoted a UN press release that detailed all the different ways that UN agencies are helping (distributing water, food, shelter, etc) to imply that all they are doing is “carrying out reproductive health assessments”. Gee, I wonder why he left out all the parts about them giving life-saving relief to people desperately in need? Probably because it didn’t suit his requirements for this week’s column/diatribe. Which makes him a scumbag, really.
    I know lots of you out there seem to feel that it’s some sort of badge of honour to slag off the UN regardless of the facts of the matter, and nothing I say will actually change that; I just think it’s hypocritical and stupid.

  5. Tom Livingston Avatar
    Tom Livingston

    The whole point is that they’re not “giving life-saving relief” – they’re just talking about it.

  6. Yes they are.

  7. Perhaps I should clarify: I meant “Yes, they are ‘giving life-saving relief’.” See here, for example:
    http://www.unicef.org/emerg/disasterinasia/24615_24699.html
    and here
    http://www.unicef.org/emerg/disasterinasia/24615_24710.html
    and here
    http://www.unicef.org/emerg/disasterinasia/24615_24713.html
    Now, I really think that if you have any decency you (and Mark Steyn, and Tim Worstall) should apologise.

  8. Tom Livingston Avatar
    Tom Livingston

    If the UN are doing the things their own site (as you quote)states then they’re keepinmg a very low profile on the box, where they are not visible to the naked eye.
    The people who are flying the stuff in and the choppers which are delivering it are seen to be American or local troops.
    In view of the hideous corruption at the UN over the Iraqi food for oil programme, now being well exposed,I wonder how much of this aid will stick to their rotten fingers.

  9. From your link Jim:
    “Five plane loads of UNICEF supplies have landed and are being distributed and more aid is on the way, according to Gerry Dyer, Chief of UNICEF’s Humanitarian Response Unit who says that some initial logistical problems created by the overwhelming level of international support have been overcome.”
    Whose planes would be doing the “distributing”? Whose trucks would be doing the “distributing”? Far as I know, the only “distributing” being done in Aceh is being done by US, Ozzie and Indonesian military vehicles. Without their help the UNICEF aid would be sitting on the ground.

  10. Tom Livingston Avatar
    Tom Livingston

    Broadening the scope of this discussion a little it was recently reported in the New York Times that Kofi “didn’t know” that his own son had his face deeply in the corruption trough of the oil for food programme. What with that, the drug and forced prostitution rings that the UN Monitors have been found running in Africa, together with the UN’s conspicuous lack of interest in the Darfur massacres, Jim and the awful Claire Short must be the only wide-eyed dreamers who still have the least faith in that creepy corrupt outfit on the Hudson.

  11. UN’s tsunami response: fly-paper for cretins

    The Indian Ocean tsunami is sure bringing out the cretin in some people. Mark Steyn is the latest one who cannot bring himself to admit that the UN might be helping the victims. So he selectively quotes from a UN…

  12. Charles Dawson Avatar
    Charles Dawson

    What Tom said was news to me so I typed “UN corruption” into Google – there were nearly three million refs.
    But a few of those I looked at were on the UN’s fight against it, but most were not.
    When the chips are down their history seems one of running round in little circles, and then passing resolutions which are universally ignored.
    Harking back a bit, any organisation which could invite the idiot Arafat to address them, while wearing a gun, five months after his mob murdered the Israeli athletes at Munich, should have been the writing on the wall.

  13. “If the UN are doing the things their own site (as you quote)states then they’re keepinmg a very low profile on the box, where they are not visible to the naked eye.”
    Ignorance is no excuse, and it’s especially no excuse to attack someone who tries to reduce it by informing you.
    Oh well, I suppose this is the closest you’ll get to actually admitting you were wrong.
    “Whose planes would be doing the “distributing”? Whose trucks would be doing the “distributing””
    Well, in Aceh most of the distribution is being done by US helicopters, and that’s great. In other areas such as Sri Lanka, the US doesn’t have a monopoly on distribution. But even if it did, so what? Are you really saying that all the people who have brought medicines, food and other life-saving stuff to the region have done nothing? Again, I imagine the people on the receiving end see it a bit differently.
    See, I’m glad the US is doing so much to improve distribution in Aceh and elsewhere. And I’m also glad that the UN has brought so much life-saving food and equipment to the area to be distributed. Why is it so hard for you to be grateful to anyone who helps, even if it’s the hated UN?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Worstall

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading